Göm menyn
Files: Description File size Format Browse
Fulltext 0,19 MB PDF (requires Acrobat Reader) Previous | Next
   
Author: Mattias Martinson
Publication title: Om Nietzsches aforistiska och experimentella religionskritik
Conference: NORLIT 2009: Codex and Code, Aesthetics, Language and Politics in an Age of Digital Media, Stockholm, August 6-9, 2009
Publication type: Article
Issue: 42
Article No.: 22
Language: Swedish
Abstract: Nietzsche’s outright hatred of Christianity and theology is well known. He confessed to an instinctive atheism (Ecce Homo) and rejected theological hermeneutics as the prime example of “bad philology” (The Antichrist). This has not prevented theologians from a thorough con-versation with Nietzsche on various issues, in a manner that often has been more receptive than polemical. Behind this curiosity one can perhaps find some form of generally acknowledged – although seldom expressed – distinction between Nietzsche’s somewhat unbalanced critique of religion and his more general proto-postmodernism, which has been understood as immensely important for the theological debate on the present situation. In this paper I discuss the dynamics of Nietzsches critique of religion, related to his experimental form and aphoristic style. I relate this to some of Theodor W. Adorno’s writings on literary form.
PDF
Publisher: Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet
Year: 2009
Available: 2010-04-27
No. of pages: 16
Pages: 271-286
Series: Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print): 1650-3740
ISSN (online): 1650-3686
File: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/042/022/ecp0942022.pdf

REFERENCE TO THIS PAGE
Martinson, Mattias (2009). Om Nietzsches aforistiska och experimentella religionskritik. http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/042/022/ (2022-09-25)


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2016-02-18