Multimodal Human-Horse Interaction in Therapy and Leisure Riding

Nataliya Berbyuk Lindström
SCCIIL Interdisciplinary Center, Department of Applied IT, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Jens Allwood
SCCIIL Interdisciplinary Center, Department of Applied IT, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Margareta Håkanson
SCCIIL Interdisciplinary Center, Department of Applied IT, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Anna Lundberg
Department of Veterinarian Medicine and Domestic Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: Proceedings of the 2nd European and the 5th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication, August 6-8, 2014, Tartu, Estonia

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 110:9, s. 61-71

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2015-05-26

ISBN: 978-91-7519-074-7

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)


Horseback-riding in general, and equine-assisted therapy in particular, are widely used for leisure and rehabilitation purposes. However, few scientific studies on human-horse interaction are available. The aim of this article is to provide a description and analysis of multimodal human-horse interaction in rid- ing sessions. Video and audio-recordings of riding sessions, interviews with the riders and observations were done in a small riding school in Western Sweden. A combination of linguistic and ethological methods is used for data analysis. The recordings are transcribed, and the sequences when human-horse interactions occur are analyzed using activity-based communication analysis and ethograms. The fol- lowing typical sub-activities of riding session are distinguished and considered: “greeting horse”, “care of horse before riding”, “tacking”, “mounting horse”, “waiting for co-riders,” “riding lesson”, “dis- mounting horse”, “care of horse after riding” and “saying goodbye to horse.” The analysis shows that the riders use vocal verbal, visual and tactile signals when they communicate with the horses. The riders tend to communicate more verbally while caring before the ride compared to after the riding lesson. The horses’ reactions are complex, comprising tactile (e.g. touch with the muzzle), visual (e.g. lifting legs, moving in the box/stable, ear and head movements, movements of the tail, etc.) as well as auditory ones, (e.g. snorting).


Inga nyckelord är tillgängliga


Anthony, D.W., Brown, D.R. 2000. Eneolithic horse exploitation in the Eurasian steppes: diet, ritual and riding. Antiquity 74, 75–86.

Allwood, J. 2000. An activity based approach to pragmatics. In: H. Bunt & B. Black (Eds.), Abduction, belief and context in dialogue: Studies in computational pragmatics (pp. 47-80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Allwood, J., Allwood, J., Cerrato, L., Jokinen, K., Navarretta, C. & Paggio, P. 2007. The MUMIN coding scheme for the annotation of feedback, turn management and sequencing phenomena. Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(3-4), 273-287.

Berbyuk Lindström, N. 2008. Intercultural communication in health care. Non-Swedish physicians in Sweden. Gothenburg: Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.

Birke, L., Hockenhull, J., Creighton, E., Pinno, L., Mee, J., Mill, D. 2011. Horses’ responses to variation in human approach. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 134, 56–63.

Brown, D.R., Anthony, D.W. 1998. Bit wear, horseback riding, and the Botai site in Kazakstan. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25, 331–347.

Chamove, A. S., Crawley-Hartrick, O. J. E., Stafford, K. J. 2002. Horse reactions to human attitudes and behaviour. Anthrozoos, 15, 323-331.

Garcia D. 2010. Of Equines and Humans: Toward a New Ecology. Ecopsychology,, 2(2), 85-89.

Hama, H., Yogo, M., Matsuyama, Y., 1996. Effects of stroking horses on both humans’ and horses’ heart rate responses. Japanese. Psychology Research, 38, 66–73.

Hausberger, M., Roche, H., Henry, S., Visser, E. K. 2008. A review of the human–horse relationship. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 109, 1-24.

Keaveney, S. M. 2008. Equines and their human companions. Journal of Business Research 61, 444-454.

Levine, M.A. 2005. Domestication and early history of the horse. In: Mills, D.M., McDonnell, S.M. (Eds.), The Domestic Horse: The Origins, Development, and Management of Its Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 5–22.

McDonnel, S. 2003. A practical field guide to horse behavior. Hong Kong: Eclipse Press, Hong Kong.

McGreevy, P. 2004. Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists. China: Saunders.

McGreevy, P. 2012. Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists. China: Saunders.

Münz, A., Eckardt, F., Witte, K. 2014. Horse–rider interaction in dressage riding. Human Movement Science, 33, 227-237.

Proops, L., McComb, K. 2010. Attributing attention: the use of human-given cues by domestic horses (Equus caballus). Animal Cognition, 13, 197-205.

Sankey C., Henry S., Go´ recka-Bruzda, A., Richard-Yris, M.-A., Hausberger, M. 2010. The Way to a Man’s Heart Is through His Stomach: What about Horses? PLoS ONE 5(11), e15446.

Seaman, S., Davidson, H., Waran, N. 2002. How reliable is temperament assessment in the domestic horse (Equus caballus)? Applied Animal Behavior Science, 78, 175–191.

Verrill, S., McDonnell, S. 2008. Equal outcomes with and without human-to-horse eye contact when catching horses and ponies in an open pasture. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 28, 309-312.

Young, T., Creighton, E., Smith, T. and Hosie C. 2012. A novel scale of behavioural indicators of stress for use with domestic horses. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 140, 33-43.

Zink R. 2008. Do horses co-communicate? Inbetween the worlds of horse and human. Insights to results of behavioral research of horses expressive behavior. Proceedings from Mench unf Pferd in Dialog. EU-konferenz. Wien 2008.

Citeringar i Crossref