Konferensartikel

Evaluation of Repowering in a Gas Fired Steam Power Plant Based on Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analysis

Mohammad Baghestani
Mechanical Engineering Faculty K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Masoud Ziabasharhagh
Mechanical Engineering Faculty K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Mohammad Hasan Khoshgoftar Maneshr
Mechanical Engineering Faculty K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Ladda ner artikelhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110571582

Ingår i: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:14, s. 1582-1589

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2011-11-03

ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

Increased competition among power generating companies; changes in generating system load requirements; lower allowable plant emissions; and changes in fuel availability and cost accentuate the need to closely assess the economics and performance of older electric generating units. Generally; decisions must be made as to whether these units should be retired and replaced with new generation capacity; whether capacity should be purchased from other generation companies; or if these existing units should be repowered. These decisions usually require the evaluation of many factors. The analysis is usually complicated due to the interaction of all the factors involved. In this paper; evaluation of a 156MW steam power plant and proposed repowered scenario has been performed. The exergy and exergoeconomic analysis method was applied in order to evaluate the proposed repowered plant. Simulation of each case has been performed in Thermoflow software. Also; computer code has been developed for exergy and exergoeconomic analysis. It is anticipated that the results provide insights useful to designers into the relations between the thermodynamic losses and capital costs; it also helps to demonstrate the merits of second law analysis over the more conventional first law analysis techniques.

Nyckelord

Repowering; Combined cycles; Gas turbines; Steam injection

Referenser

[1] M.Frankle. The standardized repowering solution for 300 MW steam power plants in Russia. Siemens AG 2006.

[2] R.carapellucci; A.Milazzo. Repowering combined cycle power plant by a modified STIG configuration . Energy Conversion and Management 48 (2007) 1590–1600. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2006.11.024.

[3] Sanjay Y; Singh O; Prasad BN. Energy and exergy analysis of steam cooled reheat gas–steam combined cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 2007; 27: 2779–2790. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.03.011.

[4] Chao Z; Yan W. Exergy cost analysis of a coal fired power plant based on structural theory of thermoeconomics. Energy Conversion and Management 2006; 47:817–843. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.06.014.

[5] Modesto M; Nebra SA. Analysis of a repowering proposal to the power generation system of a steel mill plant through the exergetic cost method; Energy 2006; 31: 3261–3277. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.032.

[6] Cziesla F. Produktkostenminimierung beim Entwurf komplexer Energieumwandlungsanlagen mit Hilfe von wissensbasierten Methoden; no. 438 in Fortschr. -Ber. VDI; Reihe 6; VDI Verlag; D¨usseldorf; 2000.

[7] Cziesla F; Tsatsaronis G. Iterative exergoeconomic evaluation and improvement of thermal power plants using fuzzy inference systems. Energy Conversion and Management 2002; 43: 1537–1548. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00034-1.

[8] Uhlenbruck S; Lucas K. Exergoeconomically-aided evolution strategy applied to a combined cycle power plant. International Journal of Thermal Science 2004; 43: 289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2003.07.003.

[9] Bejan A; Tsatsaronis G; Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. New York: Wiley; 1996.

[10] Dobrowolski R; Witkowski A; Leithner R; Simulation and optimization of power plant cycles; in: G. satsaronis; M. Moran F. Cziesla T. Bruckner (Eds.); ECOS 2002; Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Efficiency; Costs; Optimization; Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems; Berlin; Germany; 2002; pp. 766–772.

[11] Nafey AS; Fath HES; Mabrouk AA. Exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation of MSF process using a new visual package. Desalination 2006; 201: 224-240. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.09.043.

[12] Dobrowolski R; Witkowski A; Leithner R. Simulation and optimization of power plant cycles. ECOS 2002; Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Efficiency; Costs; Optimization; Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems; Berlin; Germany; 2002; pp. 766–772.

[13] Emmerich M; Grotzner M; Schutz M. Design of graph-based evolutionary algorithms: A case study for chemical process networks. Evolutionary Computation 2001; 9 (3): 329–354. doi: 10.1162/106365601750406028.

[14] Joint Army-Navy–Air Force Thermochemical Tables. NSRDS-N3537; Washington; DC: National Bureau of Standard Publications; 1985.

Citeringar i Crossref