T. Sourander
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland
M. Pietola
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland
T. Minav
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland
H. Hänninen
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland
Download articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp17144148Published in: Proceedings of 15:th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, June 7-9, 2017, Linköping, Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 144:14, p. 148-159
Published: 2017-12-20
ISBN: 978-91-7685-369-6
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
In this study, sensorless position control of hydraulic cylinders is investigated. Direct driven hydraulics units are utilized as a prime mover. Direct driven hydraulics is a valveless pump controlled hydraulic system that uses an electric motor to drive pumps for a single actuator. This brings energy saving and controllability advantages to traditional valve controlled hydraulics. Advantages and disadvantages of various types of position sensors, which are available on the market were investigated for hydraulic cylinder application. These sensors, while accurate, have been noted to be rather expensive and not suitable for harsh environment applications. Virtual sensors can provide an alternative to physical position sensors. Using only torque and speed data received from electric motor controller it is possible to simulate the position of a cylinder, provided that all relevant parameters are known. Simulation model of direct driven hydraulic system of a mining loader test platform was realized using Matlab/Simulink Simscape blocks. Results within the simulation show that the model can reach an accuracy within a few millimeters for a single cycle. A cumulative error for repeated cycles was observed, which recommends simple cylinder end or middle point proximity sensors to be used as reference points.
Sensorless position control, Virtual sensors, Direct driven hydraulics, Electrohydraulic actuator
[1] E. E. Herceg. Taking a Position on Hydraulic Cylinder Sensors. Alliance Sensors Group. Hydraulics & Pneumatics. 2015. Available: http://hydraulicspneumatics.com/cylindersactuators/taking-position-hydraulic-cylinder-sensors
[2] A. Consoli, G. Bottiglieri, R. Letor, R. Ruggeri, A. Testa, S. De Caro. Sensorless Position Control of DC Actuators for Automotive Applications. IAS 2004. MIUR-PRIN 2003: Innovative conversion topologies for electric drives.
[3] Pedro, A, Goodwin G. Virtual Sensors for Control Applications. Annual Reviews in Control 26 (2002) 101-112.
[4] Manring, N. Hydraulic Control Systems. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. 446 p. ISBN 0-471-69311-1
[5] S. Habibi. A. Goldenberg. Design of a New High-Performance ElectroHydraulic Actuator. IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 5, NO. 2, JUNE 2000. P. 158-164
[6] K. Heybroek. Saving Energy in Construction Machinery using Displacement Control Hydraulics, Concept Realization and Validation. PHD Thesis. Linkoping University, Division of Fluid and Mechanical Engineering Systems, Department of Management and Engineering. Lingkoping. 2008. 127 p.
[7] T. Minav, C. Bonato, P. Sainio & M. Pietola. Direct Driven Hydraulic Drive. In: The 9th International Fluid Power Conference. 2014
[8] C. Bonato, T. Minav, P. Sainio, M. Pietola. Position control of direct driven hydraulic drive. Proceedings of the 8th FPNI Ph.D Symposium on Fluid Power, FPNI2014. 2014, June 11-13, 2014, Lappeenranta, Finland
[9] T. Minav, L. Laurila, J. Pyrhonen. Relative position control in an electro-hydraulic forklift. International Review of Automatic Control (I.RE.A.CO.), Vol. X, n. X. 2012
[10] A. Jarf. Flow compensation using hydraulic accumulator in direct driven hydraulic differential cylinder application and effects on energy efficiency. Master’s thesis. Aalto University, School of Engineering. Espoo 2016. 102 p.
[11] Hydac. Medium heavy duty series size 2 PGI100. http://www.hydac.com/fileadmin/pdb/pdf/PRO0000000000000000000002905010012.pdf. Visited on: 5.2.2017
[12] Parker. SCPT-CAN Pressure/Temperature sensor. https://promo.parker.com/parkerimages/promosite/SensoControl/UNITED%20STATES/About%20SensoControl/PDF/SCPT-CAN-Manual.pdf.Visited on: 5.2.2017
[13] JUMO. CANtrans TRTD temperature probe with CANopen output. https://www.jumo.net/attachments/JUMO/attachmentdownload?id=4533. Visited on: 5.2.2017
[14] Posital Fraba. LINARIX Linear Sensor. https://www.posital.com/en/products/linearsensors/linarix-product-finder/LM0-CA00B-1212-2C00-PAM/125004001/detail.php. Visited on: 5.2.2017
[15] Altairnano. 24V 60Ah Battery module. http://www.altairnano.com/products/battery-module/. Visited on: 5.2.2017
[16] T. Minav, T. Lehmuspelto, P. Sainio, M. Pietola. Series hybrid Mining loader with zonal hydraulics. 10th International Fluid Power Conference. 2016
[17] T. Schimmel. Efficiency of Hydraulic Fluids – Theory and Field Testing. Evonik Oil Additives. Evonik Industries. Helsinki 2013.
[18] Shell Lubricants. Shell Tellus oils T Technical datasheet.
http://www.epc.shell.com/Docs/GPCDOC_X_cbe_24855_key_140002044283_6623.pdf. Visited on: 12.11.2016
[19] The MathWorks Inc. Fixed-Displacement Pump. 2016. https://se.mathworks.com/help/physmod/hydro/ref/fixeddisplacementpump.html. Visited on: 5.2.2017