John Chelsom
Seven Informatics Ltd, Banbury, United Kingdom / Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
Conceição Granja
Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway
Download article
Published in: Proceedings from The 16th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics 2018, Aalborg, Denmark August 28–29, 2018
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 151:16, p. 91-95
Published: 2018-08-24
ISBN: 978-91-7685-213-2
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
Care pathways are commonly used as a means to ensure the implementation of proven best practice in clinical care. They can be defined in an Electronic Health Record system using formal representations of template pathways which are then instantiated for specific patients, to guide clinical users through a sequence of tasks and actions. The open source cityEHR system uses HL7 CDA documents for the formal pathway definitions, but in practice we have found that some care pathways, and clinical protocols, can be implemented effectively using less formal mechanisms. In addition to the shared patient record itself, we find that the most important of these mechanisms are notification on recording of patient events, support for care teams, annotation of the record, and the clinician-centred ’In-Tray’. One important feature lost in this approach is the ability to report on the variance of the care provided to the patient from the best practice encapsulated in a more formally defined pathway. To address this, we describe a method for transforming a formally defined care pathway to a finite state machine representation and querying the patient record to generate a retrospective report on the variance of states recorded in the patient record.
[1] Gooch P, Roudsari A. Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2011;18(6):738-748.
[2] Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C, Behlen FM, Biron PV, et al. HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2006;13(1):30-39.
[3] Chelsom J, Pande I, Gaywood I, Granja C, Bolle SR. Document-Driven Care Pathways Using HL7 CDA. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on eHealth T, and Social Medicine. International Academy, Research and Industry Association; 2015 Presented at: eTelemed February 22-27, 2015; Lisbon, Portugal p. 118-123.
[4] Ueckert F, Goerz M, Ataian M, Tessmann S, Prokosch H-U. Empowerment of patients and communication with health care professionals through an electronic health record. International journal of medical informatics. 2003;70(2-3):99-108.
[5] White A, Danis M. Enhancing patient-centered communication and collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room. Jama. 2013;309(22):2327-2328.
[6] Bitton A. Who is on the home team? Redefining the relationship between primary and specialty care in the patient-centered medical home. LWW; 2011.
[7] Wakamiya S, Yamauchi K. What are the standard functions of electronic clinical pathways? International journal of medical informatics. 2009;78(8):543-550.
[8] Eshuis R. Symbolic model checking of UML activity diagrams. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM). 2006;15(1):1-38.
[9] Awad A, Decker G, Weske M. Efficient compliance checking using BPMN-Q and temporal logic. In: Proceedings of the Springer; Presented at: International Conference on Business Process Management, 2008; p. 326-341.
[10] Barnett J, Akolkar R, Auburn R, Bodell M, Burnett D, Carter J, et al. State chart XML (SCXML) state machine notation for control abstraction. W3C Recommendation. 2015.
[11] Harel D, Lachover H, Naamad A, Pnueli A, Politi M, Sherman R, et al. Statemate: A working environment for the development of complex reactive systems. IEEE Transactions on software engineering. 1990;16(4):403-414.
