Prasanna Welahettige
Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University College of Southeast Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway
Bernt Lie
Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University College of Southeast Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway
Knut Vaagsaether
Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University College of Southeast Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway
Britt M.E Moldestad
Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University College of Southeast Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway
Download articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp17138128Published in: Proceedings of the 58th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 58) Reykjavik, Iceland, September 25th – 27th, 2017
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 138:17, p. 128-136
Published: 2017-09-27
ISBN: 978-91-7685-417-4
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
The objective of this study was using computational
fluid dynamics simulation with OpenFOAM to study the
fluidization properties for four types of particles
classified as Geldart A, B, C and D. Fluidization regimes
were studied for particles with the same density but
different diameters. The particle diameters were selected
based on Geldart’s classification of particles. The
simulation results were validated against experimental
data. Pressure gradient, flow regime change, bubble rise,
bubble splitting and bed expansion were studied for all
four types of particles for different superficial velocities.
Group-B and D particles easily produced bubbles.
However, Group-C and A particles gave very high bed
expansion, and no clear bubbles were observed. Bed
with the Group-D particles, the bubbles was large and
some of the bubbles reached the diameter of the bed.
Group-B particles gave smaller and on average more
stable bubbles than Group-D particles. There was no
bubble formation from Group-C and Group-A until the
inlet superficial velocity was 25 times and 5 times larger,
respectively, than their minimum fluidization velocities.
Fluidization, bubble, Geldart’s
classification, pressure gradient, flow regimes,
OpenFOAM