With service design taking increasingly strategic and transformational roles, effective organizational partnership and engagement has become crucial. However, since organizational communities are structured and function differently from social communities, participatory service innovation methods like co-design need to take additional factors and different strategies into account for effective engagement and participation in these settings. We draw from discussions in organizational studies to highlight challenges with regards to engagement in innovation processes within and across communities in organizations. Further, we look at knowledge brokers, a concept that features prominently in discourse in this area and outline it theoretically and through a strategy of application in co-design settings. Hence, we contribute to the current service design discourse by adding insights to both theory and practice. Finally, we describe the application of this strategy in two exploratory case studies with differing scales in terms of both the service being designed and the nature of participation from organizational communities.
service design, knowledge brokers, co-design, design legacies, organizational studies
Boari, C., Riboldazzi, F., 2014. How knowledge brokers emerge and evolve: The role of actors’ behaviour. Res. Policy 43, 683–695. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.007
Brandt, E., Messeter, J., 2004. Facilitating collaboration through design games. Presented at the Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices-Volume 1, ACM, pp. 121–131.
Brown, J.S., Duguid, P., 1998. Organizing knowledge. Calif. Manage. Rev. 40, 90–111.
Buur, J., Mitchell, R., 2011. The business modeling lab, in: Proceedings of the Participatory Innovation Conference. pp. 368–373.
Carlile, P.R., 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15, 555–568.
Daniela Sangiorgi, 2011. Transformative Services and Transformation Design. Int. J. Des. Vol 5 No 2 2011.
Franke, N., Shah, S., 2003. How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy 32, 157–178.
Gould, R.V., Roberto, M., 1989. Formal Approach to Brokerage in. Sociol Methodol 19, 89–126.
Junginger, S., 2015. Organizational Design Legacies and Service Design. Des. J. 18, 209–226. doi: 10.2752/175630615X14212498964277
Kimble, C., Grenier, C., Goglio-Primard, K., 2010. Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 30, 437–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.002
Marc Steen, Menno Manschot, Nicole De Koning, 2011. Benefits of Co-design in Service Design Projects. Int. J. Des. Vol 5 No 2 2011.
Martin, R.L., 2009. The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Press.
Meyer, M., 2010. The Rise of the Knowledge Broker. Sci. Commun. 32, 118–127. doi:10.1177/1075547009359797
Möller, K., Rajala, R., Westerlund, M., 2008. Service Innovation Myopia? A New Recipe for Client-Provider Value Creation. Calif. Manage. Rev. 50, 31–48. doi: 10.2307/41166444
Newbery, P., Farnham, K., 2013. Experience Design: A Framework for Integrating Brand, Experience, and Value. John Wiley & Sons.
Roser, T., Samson, A., Humphreys, P., Cruz-Valdivieso, E., 2009. Co-creation: new pathways to value: an overview. Promise LSE Enterp.
Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J., 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 5–18. doi: 10.1080/15710880701875068
Sanders, E.-N., 2000. Generative tools for co-designing, in: Collaborative Design. Springer, pp. 3–12.
Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R., 1989. Institutional Ecology, `Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19, 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
Wenger, E., 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, 1st edition. ed. Cambridge University Press.
