Miyong Lee
Division of Human Mechanical Systems and Design, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Japan
Kazuhiro Nishida
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Japan
Yoshihiro Narita
Division of Human Mechanical Systems and Design, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Japan
Download article![](/images/PDF_24.png)
Published in: KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 100:61, p. 735-742
Published: 2014-06-11
ISBN: 978-91-7519-276-5
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
Weight is frequently used in product information and the design process. However; the perceived weight is greatly influenced by individual subjectivity. Guessing the exact weight using only numerical information and visual estimation is not easy. Therefore; this study focused on the relationship between the perceived weight and actual weight; and verified the difference between the subjective and physical senses of weight. In other words; we aimed to explore the error range; and to reveal the characteristics of the subjective sense of weight. We performed two experiments. Experiment A is for the ‘subjective sense of weight due to the difference in weigh’ using models with differing weights but the same size; and Experiment B is for the ‘subjective sense of weight by size’ using models with differing sizes but the same weight. In the results; the average subjective weight of the 170 g model was 223 g for an error rate of approximately 31%. On the other hand; the average subjective weight of the 100 g model was 103 g. Therefore; the error between the subjective and physical weights was greatest at 100–170 g in Experiment A. In Experiment B; the average subjective weight of the 170 g model with a diameter of 75 mm was 298 g; which is 75% greater than the physical weight. The error for the 170 g model was smallest at -4% when the diameter was 120 mm. In other words; the error decreased with increasing model size in Experiment B.
Kansei Evaluation; Subjective Weight; Perceived Weight; Recognition Model; Sensory Measurement.
De Camp; J. E. (1917). The influence of color on apparent weight. A preliminary study. Journal of
Experimental Psychology; Vol 2(5); Oct 1917; 347-370.
Engineering Centre ECAR(2010). A380 weight saving project. Retrieved March 3; 2014; from http://en.ecar-airbus.ru/projects/a380-weight-saving-project/
Kazuhiro N.; Lee M.; Yoshihiro N. (2012). ?????????????????????? [Experimental verification of subjective mass based on individual Kansei]. Proceedings of Conference 14th of JSKE [CD
ROM]. F4-5. Tokyo; Japan.
Yann MOGENOT (2012). Weight saving methodology and application to an hybrid roadster. Retrieved March 3; 2014; from http://emc-mec.ca/ev2012ve/proceedings/EV2012VE23T1s2-03-YannMogenot-USherbrooke_WeightSavingHybridRoadster.pdf#search=’weight+saving’