Conference article

Fourteen volunteers were asked to participate in an experiment, along with answering a survey, to evaluate the performance of three peripherals: the Xbox 360 Wired Controller, a keyboard, and the Rock Band Fender Stratocaster Wired Guitar Controller. The participants played a prototype made in Unity, and their accuracy scores were analyzed in R using ANOVA. However, no significant quantifiable difference was found based on which peripheral was being used. The scores were also analyzed using Pearson’s Product-Moment correlation, and we were able to determine that the variation in accuracy scores was directly linked to the participant’s specific test run in the experiment. Taking this into consideration along with results of our observational data and participant feedback, we found that there were more factors at play, in regards to playability and accuracy, than just the input device itself. The learning effect of repetitive play of the prototype and input devices, the control input scheme, and the participant’s chosen peripheral manipulation method all had an impact.

Game play; input devices; evaluation

[AT11] A. THORPE MINHUA MA A. O.: History and alternative game input method. In Computer Games (CGAMES), 2011 16th International Conference on. IEEE (2011), pp. 76–93. 1

[DR99] DUMAS J. S., REDISH J.: A practical guide to usability testing. Intellect Books, 1999. 3

[NCM09] NATAPOV D., CASTELLUCCI S., MACKENZIE I. S.: Iso 9241-9 evaluation of video game controllers. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009 (2009). 1

[Rub94] RUBIN J.: Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1994. 3