In cross-disciplinary projects, stakeholders often come with different abilities to express their requirements or negotiate future scenarios. To meet these different abilities, a participatory approach offers a variety of methods that can create a platform for discussions but not always can exclude emerging hierarchies between different stakeholder groups. In this context simulation games represent an interesting alternative to act and discuss in an altered space by providing a playful approach. This paper reports on the development of Work A Round, a simulation game designed for the consultancy and planning in the field of multi– located knowledge work and workplace design. It further discusses, how simulation games might be used in a research context as well and whether they might compete with classical qualitative methods.
Eckert, Jan; Luppino, Nicolo (2016) Work A Round, a Simulation Game for Mobile Work and Workplace design, in Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal of Theory, Practice and
Research, Special Issue on Service Design
Amstutz, S.; Schwehr, P.; Schulze, H.; Krömker, H. (2013) Office in Motion. Arbeitswelten für die Wissensarbeitenden von morgen. Competence Center Typology & Planning in Architecture,
Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Ashforth,B.E.; Kreiner, G.E; Fugate, M. (2000); All in a Day’S Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions; The Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.
Brandt, E.; , Messeter, J; (2004) Facilitating Collaboration through Design Games In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: interweaving media, materials and practices. (vol. 1, pp. 121-131). New York, USA: ACM.
De Bruyne, E., De Jong, A. (2008) The Workplace Game: Exploring End Users’ New Behaviour. In: Proceedings of the conference on Applied Ergonomics 2008, Las Vegas, USA.
De Jong, A., De Bruyne, E. (2008) Participatory design of office spaces by game playing?
In: Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics 2008 Int. Conf., Las Vegas
De Jong, A., Kouprie, M.; De Bruyne, E. (2009) Effects of the Workplace Game: A Case-Study into Anticipating Future Behavior of Office Workers
In: B.-T. Karsh (Ed.), Ergonomics and health aspects, HCII 2009 (pp. 3-12). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Habraken, N. J., & Gross, M. (1987). Concept design games (Book One: Developing, Book Two: Playing) (Report submitted to the National Science Foundation Engineering Directorate). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Department of Architecture, MIT.
Habraken, N. J., & Gross, M. (1988). Concept design games In Design Studies, Vol. 9 Number 3, July 1988, 150-158
Hannula, O.; Irrmann, O.; Smeds, R. (2014) Modeling Knowledge Co-Creation Games as Activity Systems In Proceedings oft he 45th Conference of the
International Simulation and Gaming Association, At Dornbirn, Austria, p. 186-198
Johansson, M. & Linde, P. (2005); Playful collaboration exploration New research practice in participatory design.
Klabbers, J. H. G. (2006). A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing.
Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 37, 155-173.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and
development. New York, USA: Prentice Hall.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009, June). The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of
experiential learning. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 297-327, first published on October 10, 2008.
doi: 10.1177/1046878108325713.
Kriz, Willy C.; Nöbauer, B. (2002) Debriefing von Planspielen. In U. Blötz & B. f. B. B. Bonn (Ed.), Planspiele in der beruflichen Bildung Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
Kriz, Willy C. (2003) Creating Effective Learning Environments and Learning Organizations
through Gaming Simulation Design in Simulation Gaming 2003; 34; 495 DOI: 10.1177/1046878103258201, 495-511
Kriz, Willy C. (2008) A Systemic-Constructivist Approach to the Facilitation and Debriefing
of
Simulations and Games in Simulation Gaming 2010 41: 663 originally published online 20 June 2008 DOI: 10.1177/1046878108319867, 663-680
Vaajakallio, K.; Mattelmäki, T. (2014) Design games in codesign: as a tool, a mindset and a structure, In CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design
and the Arts, 10:1, 63-77
Wagemann, R. (1999). So haben sich selbst steuernde Teams Erfolg Organsiationsentwicklung, 1, 44-55
