Conference article

Revita: a System for Language Learning and Supporting Endangered Languages

Anisia Katinskaia
Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland

Javad Nouri
Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland

Roman Yangarber
Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland

Download article

Published in: Proceedings of the Joint 6th Workshop on NLP for Computer Assisted Language Learning and 2nd Workshop on NLP for Research on Language Acquisition at NoDaLiDa, Gothenburg, 22nd May 2017

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 134:4, p.

NEALT Proceedings Series 30:4, p.

Show more +

Published: 2017-05-11

ISBN: 978-91-7685-502-7

ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)


We describe a computational system for language learning and supporting endangered languages. The platform provides the user an opportunity to improve her competency through active language use. The platform currently works with several endangered Finno-Ugric languages, as well as with Yakut, and Finnish, Swedish, and Russian. This paper describes the current stage of ongoing development.


No keywords available


Medani Osman Ahmed. 1989. Vocabulary learning strategies. Beyond words, pages 3–14.

Ken Beatty. 2013. Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning. Routledge.

J. Brown, G. Firshkoff, and M. Eskenazi. 2005. Automatic question generation for vocabulary assessment. In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP-2005.

Carol Chapelle and Joan Jamieson. 1983. Language lessons on the PLATO IV system. System, 11(1):13–20.

C. Chen, H. Liou, and J. Chang. 2006. Fast—an automatic generation system for grammar tests. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL, Interactive Presentation Sessions.

Larrie E Gale. 1989. Macario, Montevidisco, and interactive D´igame: Developing interactive video for language instruction. Modern technology in foreign language education: Applications and projects, pages 235–247.

Peter JM Groot. 2000. Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1):60–81.

Robert Hart. 1981. Language study and the PLATO system. Studies in Language Learning, 3(1):1–24.

Trude Heift. 2001. Intelligent language tutoring systems for grammar practice. Zeitschrift f¨ur Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 6(2).

ES Klyshinsky, NA Kochetkova, MI Litvinov, and V Yu Maximov. 2011. Method of POSdisambiguation using information about words cooccurrence (for Russian). Proc. of GSCL, pages 191–195.

Stephen Krashen. 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The modern language journal, 73(4):440–464.

Batia Laufer and Monica Hill. 2000. What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning & Technology, 3(2):58–76.

John Lee and Stephanie Seneff. 2007. Automatic generation of cloze items for prepositions. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH, Antwerp, Belgium.

Denise E Murray. 2014. Knowledge machines: Language and information in a technological society. Routledge.

Noriko Nagata. 2002. Banzai: An application of natural language processing to web-based language learning. CALICO journal, pages 583–599.

Ian Stephen Paul Nation. 2013. Teaching & learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Juan Pino, Michael Heilman, and Maxine Eskenazi. 2008. A selection strategy to improve cloze question quality. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains at the 9th Internationnal Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

Peter Prince. 1996. Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. The modern language journal, 80(4):478–493.

Chi-Chiang Shei. 2001. FollowYou!: An automatic language lesson generation system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(2).

Simon Smith, P V S Avinesh, and Adam Kilgarriff. 2010. Gap-fill tests for language learners: Corpusdriven item generation. In Proceedings of ICON-2010: 8th International Conference on Natural Language Processing.

W. L. Taylor. 1953. Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30.

Torsten Zesch and Oren Melamud. 2014. Automatic generation of challenging distractors using contextsensitive inference rules. In Proceedings of the NinthWorkshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pages 143–148, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Citations in Crossref