Conference article

Estonian Copular and Existential Constructions as an UD Annotation Problem

Kadri Muischnek
University of Tartu, Estonia

Kaili Müürisep
University of Tartu, Estonia

Download article

Published in: Proceedings of the NoDaLiDa 2017 Workshop on Universal Dependencies, 22 May, Gothenburg Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 135:10, p. 79-85

NEALT Proceedings Series 31:10, p. 79-85

Show more +

Published: 2017-05-29

ISBN: 978-91-7685-501-0

ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

This article is about annotating clauses with nonverbal predication in version 2 of Estonian UD treebank. Three possible annotation schemas are discussed, among which separating existential clauses from copular clauses would be theoretically most sound but would need too much manual labor and could possibly yield inconcistent annotation. Therefore, a solution has been adapted which separates existential clauses consisting only of subject and (copular) verb olema be from all other olema-clauses.

Keywords

No keywords available

References

Mati Erelt, Reet Kasik, Helle Metslang, Henno Rajandi, Kristiina Ross, Henn Saari, Kaja Tael, and Silvi Vare. 1993. Eesti keele grammatika II.  Süntaks. Eesti TA Keele ja Kirjanduse instituut.

Mati Erelt, editor. 2003. Estonian Language. Linguistica Uralica Supplementary series, volume 1. Estonian Academy Publishers, Tallinn.

Mati Erelt. 2013. Eesti keele lausepetus. Sissejuhatus. Öeldis. Tartu likool.

Petar Kehayov. 2008. Olema-verbi ellipsist eesti kirjakeeles. In Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat, volume 54, pages 107–152. Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus.

Matti Miestamo. 2014. Partitives and negation: A cross-linguistic survey . In Partitive cases and related categories, volume 54 of Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, pages 63–86. De Gruyter Mouton.

Line Mikkelsen. 2011. Copular clauses. In Klaus von Heusinger Claudia Maienborn and Paul Portner, editors, Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, volume 2, pages 1805–1829. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kadri Muischnek, Kaili Müürisep, Tiina Puolakainen, Eleri Aedmaa, Riin Kirt, and Dage Särg. 2014. Estonian Dependency Treebank and its annotation scheme. In Verena Henrich et al., editors, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT13), pages 285–291. University of Tübingen.

Kadri Muischnek, Kaili Müürisep, and Tiina Puolakainen. 2016. Estonian Dependency Treebank: from Constraint Grammar Tagset to Universal Dependencies. In Proc. of LREC 2016.

Peep Nemvalts. 2000. Aluse sisu ja vorm. Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.

Joakim Nivre, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Filip Ginter, Yoav Goldberg, Jan Hajic, Christopher D. Manning, Ryan T. McDonald, Slav Petrov, Sampo Pyysalo, Natalia Silveira, Reut Tsarfaty, and Daniel Zeman. 2016. Universal Dependencies v1: A Multilingual Treebank Collection. In LREC. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).

Citations in Crossref