Miguel A. Bernal Pampin
Department of Chemical Engineering and Seminar of Renewable Energy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Laira Cristóbal Andrade
Department of Chemical Engineering and Seminar of Renewable Energy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Pastora M. Bello Bugallo
Department of Chemical Engineering and Seminar of Renewable Energy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Download article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110571135Published in: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:1, p. 1135-1142
Published: 2011-11-03
ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
This paper presents the optimization of the consumption and production rates of a steam reforming plant using natural gas as raw material for generating hydrogen as principal product. Different strategies are applied to select the most adequate techniques and to obtain different configurations or alternatives for the process. The methodology used in this work includes both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The aim of this work is to apply various possible alternatives to control emissions and reduce energy inputs; according to the recommendations of the European IPPC Bureau and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The actions are oriented towards reducing the consumption of the plant by improving process heat recovery and improving energy integration. The results will be focused on the energy consumption analysis for the different alternatives; showing the best option to design the plant; maximizing production and optimizing energy use. This approach produces large amounts of hydrogen; decreases environmental impacts and increases economical profits.
[1] Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of industrial chemistry; Gas production; G; 2007; pp.91-259.
[2] Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of industrial chemistry; Hydrogen; H; 2007; pp. 827-959.
[3] A.C. Vosloo; Fischer–Tropsch: a futuristic view; Fuel Processing Technology 71; 2001; pp.149–155.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00143-6.
[4] D.J. Wilhelm; D.R. Simbeck; A.D. Karp; R.L. Dickenson; Syngas production for gas-toliquids applications: technologies; issues and outlook; Fuel Processing Technology 71; 2001; pp.139-148.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00140-0.
[5] T. Rostrup-Nielsen; Manufacture of hydrogen; Catalysis Today 106; 2005; pp. 293–296.
doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.149.
[6] J.I. Linares Hurtado; B.Y. Moratilla Soria; Hydrogen as an energetic vector (I/II) (in Spanish); 2007; available at https://www.icai.es/.
[7] I. Rafiqul; C. Weber; B. Lehmann; A. Voss; Energy efficiency improvements in ammonia production perspectives and uncertainties; Energy 30; 2005; pp. 2487-2504.
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.12.004.
[8] C. Koroneos; A. Dompros; G. Roumbas; N. Moussiopoulos; Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel production processes; International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 29; 2004; pp. 1443-1450.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.01.016.
[9] European Commission; Council Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control; Official Journal of the European Communities L 257; 1995; pp. 26-40.
[10] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Reports of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project activities; available at http://cdm.unfccc.int/.
[11] A. A. Evers FAIR-PR; http://www.hydrogenambassadors.com/; (accessed 10/12/2010).
[12] Florida Solar Energy Center; Hydrogen basics; www.fsec.ucf.edu/; (accessed 10/12/2010).
[13] European Commision; European IPPC Bureau (EIPPCB); http://eippcb.jrc.es/.
[14] J. Ruddock; T.D. Short; K. Brudenell; Energy integration in ammonia production. Sustainable World 7; 2003; pp. 267-276.
[15] The International Fertilizer Industry Association IFA; Fertilizer supply statistics; available from http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa.
[16] The International Fertilizer Industry Association. IFA; Fertilizers and Climate Change; available from http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa.
[17] R. Mendivil; U. Fischer; M. Hirao; K. Hungerbühler; A New LCA Methodology of Technology Evolution (TE-LCA) and its application to the production of ammonia (1950-2000); International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11 (2); 2006; pp. 98-105.
doi: 10.1065/lca2005.08.222.
[18] E. Worrell; K. Blok; Energy savings in the nitrogen fertilizer industry in the Netherlands. Energy 19 (2); 1994; pp. 195-202.
doi: 10.1016/0360-5442(94)90060-4.
[19] European Commission; Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Manufacture of Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals-Ammonia; Acids and Fertilisers; Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS); 2007; pp 35-94.
[20] European Commission; Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Energy Efficiency; Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS); 2008.
[21] European Fertilizer Manufacturers Association EFMA; Best Available Techniques for Pollution Prevention and Control in the European Fertilizer Industry; Production of ammonia; Booklet 1; 2000.
[22] U.S. EPA. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency); Department of Energy; A Consumer`s Guide to Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; Industry Plant Managers and Engineers; 2008; available at http://www.epa.gov/.
[23] U.S. Department of Energy-Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; Industry plant Managers and Engineers: 20 Ways to Save Energy Now; 2008; available at http://www.eere.energy.gov/.