Christian Kral
Electric Machines, Drives and Systems, Vienna, Austria
Anton Haumer
Technical Consulting, St.Andrä-Wördern, Austria
Download article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp14096145Published in: Proceedings of the 10th International Modelica Conference; March 10-12; 2014; Lund; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 96:15, p. 145-153
Published: 2014-03-10
ISBN: 978-91-7519-380-9
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
Abstract A new quasi static fundamental wave machines library will be included in the magnetic domain package of the next Modelica Standard Library (MSL). The provided classes of machine models omit all transient electrical effects; but mechanical dynamics are fully taken into account. By including the new machine models new classes of problems can be treated; enabling fast electric machine and drive simulations. Yet; all the characteristic loss effects of transient machine models are fully taken into account; where needed. Phase numbers greater than three are supported. For each machine type available in the MSL there will then exist both a fully transient and a quasi static electric machine model.
Abstract The package structure of the quasi static fundamental wave package and the concept of implementation will be presented. All required assumptions and limitations for operating the new machine models will be presented and discussed. Deviating parameters compared to the transient machine models will be discussed and explained. Simulation examples will be presented and compared with transient simulation experiments. Possible applications for the new machine models will be outlined.
Quasi static fundamental wave electric machine models; multi phase; transient effects; reference frame
[1] C. Kral and A. Haumer, “The new fundamentalwave library for modeling rotating electrical three phase machines,” 8th International Modelica Conference, 2011.
[2] A. Haumer, C. Kral, J. V. Gragger, and H. Kapeller, “Quasi-stationary modeling and simulation of electrical circuits using complex phasors,” International Modelica Conference, 6th, Bielefeld, Germany, pp. 229–236, 2008.
[3] N. Rabe, “An approach for modelling quasi-stationary magnetic circuits,” 9th International Modelica Conference, 2012.
[4] C. Kral, A. Haumer, and S. B. Lee, “A practical thermalmodel for the estimation of permanentmagnet and stator winding temperatures,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 455–464, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2253128
[5] A. Iqbal, E. Levi, M. Jones, and S. Vukosavic, “Generalised sinusoidal PWM with harmonic injection for multi-phase VSIs,” PESC ’06. 37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2006, 2006. DOI: 10.1109/PESC.2006.1712206
[6] M. J. Duran, F. Barrero, and S. Toral, “Multi-phase space vector pulse width modulation: Applications and strategies.,” Inertnational Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality, ICREPQ 2007, 2007.
[7] D. Dujic, E. Levi, M. Jones, G. Grandi, G. Serra, and A. Tani, “Continuous PWM techniques for sinusoidal voltage generation with seven-phase voltage source inverters,” Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2007. PESC 2007. IEEE, pp. 47–52, 2007.
[8] S. Halasz, “PWM strategies of multi-phase inverters,” IECON 2008. 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics, 2008.
[9] D. Dujic, M. Jones, and E. Levi, “Generalised space vector PWM for sinusoidal output voltage generation with multiphase voltage source inverters,” International Journal of Industrial Electronics and Drives, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009. DOI: 10.1504/IJIED.2009.025341
[10] M. Mengoni, Modulation Techniques for Multi-Phase Converters and Control Strategies for Multi-Phase Electric Drives. PhD thesis, University of Bologna, 2010.
