Conference article

Control vs. Raising in English. A Dependency Grammar Account

Timothy Osborne
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Matthew Reeve
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Download article

Published in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2017), September 18-20, 2017, Università di Pisa, Italy

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 139:21, s. 176-186

Show more +

Published: 2017-09-13

ISBN: 978-91-7685-467-9

ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

This contribution presents a dependency grammar (DG) account of control and raising in English. Due to the minimalism of DG analyses of sentence structure, the difference between control and raising cannot be captured in the syntactic structure alone. The situation forces the DG account to reach to some other aspect of dependency syntax other than the raw hierarchies of structure to account for the differences between control and raising. This other aspect is valency. Valency has, of course, been a central subtheory of dependency syntax since Tesnière (1959/2015: Book D). By augmenting the valency frames of predicates to distinguish between valents that are and are not semantic arguments of the predicate at hand, the differences between control and raising can be acknowledged and accommodated.

Keywords

No keywords available

References

Andrew Carnie. 2013. Syntax: A Generative Introduc-tion, 3rd edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA.

Noam Chomsky. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

Peter Culicover and Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press.

dtv Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 1978. Herausgegeben von Gerhard Wahrig. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, München.

Ulrich Engel. 1994. Syntax der deutschen Gegenwarts-sprache, 3rd fully revised edition. Erich Schmidt, Berlin.

Hans-Werner Eroms. 2000. Syntax der deutschen Spra-che. de Gruyter, Berlin.

Thomas Groß and Timothy Osborne. 2009. Toward a practical dependency grammar theory of disconti-nuities. SKY Journal of Linguistics 22, 43–90.

Liliane Haegeman. 1991. Introduction to Government .& Binding Theory. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

David G. Hays. 1964. Dependency theory: A formal-ism and some observations. Language 40, 511–25.

Hans Jürgen Heringer. 1996. Deutsche Syntax Dependentiell. Staufenberg, Tübingen.

Richard Hudson. 1990. English Word Grammar. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

Jürgen Kunze. 1975. Abhängigkeitsgrammatik. Studia Grammatica 12. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

James McCawley. 1998. The Syntactic Phenomena of English, 2nd ed. The University of Chicago Press.

Igor Mel’cuk and Nikolai Pertsov. 1987. Surface syn-tax of English: A formal model with the Meaning-Text Framework. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Klaus Schubert. 1987. Metataxis: Contrastive depend-ency syntax for machine translation. Foris Publica-tions, Dordrecht.

Stanley Starosta. 2003. Dependency grammar and lex-icalism. In Vilmos Ágel et al. (eds.), Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Con-temporary Research, vol. 1, pp. 270–81. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

Kalevi Tarvainen. 1981. Einführung in die De-pendenzgrammatik. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Mün-chen.

Lucien Tesnière. 1959. Éléments de syntax structurale. Klincksieck, Paris.

Lucien Tesnière. 2015 (1959). Elements of structural syntax, translated by Timothy Osborne and Sylvain Kahane. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Citations in Crossref