Pascal W. Galloway
Sustainable Energy Research Group, School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, UK
Luke E. Myers
Sustainable Energy Research Group, School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, UK
AbuBakr S. Bahaj
Sustainable Energy Research Group, School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, UK
Download article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110572246Published in: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:14, p. 2246-2253
Published: 2011-11-03
ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
Little has been done to investigate the behaviour of Marine Current Energy Converters (MCECs) in unsteady flow caused by wave motion and yaw. The additional loading applied to the rotor through the action of waves and whilst operating at yaw could dictate the structural design of blades as well as the proximity to the water surface. The strongly bi-directional nature of the flow encountered at many tidal energy sites may lead to devices employing zero rotor yaw control. Subsequent reductions in device capital cost may outweigh reduced power production and increased dynamic loading for a rotor operating at yaw. The experiments presented in this paper were conducted using a 1/20th scale 3-bladed horizontal axis MCEC at a large towing tank facility. The turbine had the capability to measure thrust and torque via a custom waterproof dynamometer. A BEM (Blade Element Momentum) code developed within the university was modified to include wave and yaw; with a view to further understanding the primary loading upon the rotor and individual blades.
[1] C. Swan; R. L. James; A simple analytical model for surface water waves on a depth-varying current; Applied Ocean Research; Vol. 22; 2001; pp. 331-347.
doi: 10.1016/S0141-1187(00)00022-5.
[2] J. A. Smith; Wave-Current Interaction in Finite Depth. Journal of Physical Oceanography; Vol.36; 2006; pp. 1403-1419.
doi: 10.1175/JPO2911.1.
[3] J. Wolf; D. Prandle; Some observations of wave-current interaction; Coastal Engineering; Vol. 37; (1999); pp. 471-485.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-3839(99)00039-3.
[4] M. A. Srokosz; Models of Wave-Current Interaction; Advances in Underwater Technology; Ocean Engineering; Vol.12; 1987; pp. 313-325.
[5] L. E. Myers; A. S. Bahaj; Scale reproduction of the flow field for tidal energy converters; Proc. 10th World Renewable Energy Congress; Glasgow; UK; 2008.
[6] N. Barltrop; et al. Wave-current interactions in marine current turbines; Proc. 6th European Wave and Tidal Conference; Glasgow; UK; 2005; pp. 33-38.
[7] J. V. Norris; E. Droniou; Update on EMEC activities; resource description; and characterisation of wave-induced velocities in a tidal flow; Proc. 7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference; Porto; Portugal; 2007.
[8] P. W. Galloway; L. E.; Myers; A. S. Bahaj; Studies of a scale tidal turbine in close proximity to waves; Proc. 3rd International Conference on Ocean Energy; Bilbao; Spain; 2010.
[9] A. F. Molland; The design; construction and calibration of a five-component strain gauge wind tunnel dynamometer; University of Southampton; Ship Science Report; 1/77; ISSN 0140-3818; 1976.
[10] C. Abonnel; et al. Some aspects of EDF modelling and testing activities; within its marine current energy research and development project; Proc. 6th European Wave and Tidal Conference; Glasgow; UK; 2005; pp. 1-10.
[11] Barnsley and Wellicome; Final report on the 2nd phase of development and testing of a horizontal axis wind turbine test rig for the investigation of stall regulation aerodynamics; carried out under ETSU agreement E.5A/CON5103/1746; 1990.
[12] A. S. Bahaj; et al. Experimental Investigation into the Hydrodynamic Performance of Marine Current Turbines; Sustainable Energy Series; Report 3; 2005.
