Conference article

To what Extent does the Pedagogy adopted by Trainee Teachers affect Children’s Creativity in Primary Design and Technology Activities?

Penny Bailey
Birmingham City University, UK

Download article

Published in: PATT 26 Conference; Technology Education in the 21st Century; Stockholm; Sweden; 26-30 June; 2012

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 73:5, p. 47-56

Show more +

Published: 2012-06-18

ISBN: 978-91-7519-849-1

ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

End of module evaluations from Primary Education trainee teachers in an English university indicate that many trainees lack confidence in supervising practical activities within the classroom. This initial

This paper presents some initial findings from a small scale study undertaken in June 2011 with students from a first year of a Primary Education undergraduate course based in an English university. The findings from this initial study originated from a design challenge day; when the trainees were asked to work with 60 eleven years old pupils and act as mentors to small groups of pupils. The pupils were asked to adopt a design process inspired by design engineers at Dyson and designed and made design prototypes for a new product using air. The data collection methods used were questionnaires with trainees; photographs of pupil outcomes; observations during the day and trainees’ reflective diaries.

The evidence suggests that the trainees encountered a number of creativity inhibitors during the day (Fasciato and Rogers 2005) and these were centred on supporting dynamics of pupil groups; risk taking and collaborative interaction.

Keywords

No keywords available

References

Bell J. (1987). Doing Your Research project: A Guide for First Time Researchers in Education and Social Science; Buckingham: Open University Press.

Benson; C. and Lunt J. (2011). “I’m choosing purple not pink”. In K. Stables; C. Benson & M. De Vries PATT25/CRIPT8 Perspectives on Learning in Design & Technology Education. London: University of London.

Davies; T. (1996). Modelling and creativity in design and technology. IN E.W.L. Norman (ed.) IDATER 1996 Conference Proceedings; Loughborough: Loughborough University.

Fasciato; M. & Rogers; M. (2004) Creativity in practice…What not to do… IN E.W.L. Norman; and D. Spendlove; (eds.). The Design and Technology Association International Research Conference; Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.

Haffenden; D. (2004) Compliance and creativity? IN E.W.L. Norman; and D. Spendlove; (eds.). The Design and Technology Association International Research Conference; Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.

Hamilton; J. (2007) Enhancing learning through collaborative inquiry and action. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal; 12 [3]; 33-46.

Kruger; A. C. (1993). Peer collaboration: Conflict; cooperation; or both? Social Development; 2(3); 165-182.

McLellan R. & Nicholl B.; (2008). The importance of classroom climate in fostering student creativity in Design & Technology lessons. IN: Norman; E.W.L. and Spendlove; D. (eds.). The Design and Technology Association International Research Conference. Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.

Mettas; A. and Constantinou; C.; (2006). The technology Fair: a project-based learning approach for enhancing problem solving skills and interest in design and technology education. International Journal of Design Education; 18[1]; 79-100.

Musta’amal; A. H. Norman; E. & Hodgeson; T. (2009) Observing creative behaviours. IN: Norman; E. and Spendlove; D. (eds.). The Design and Technology Association International Research Conference 2009. Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.

National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE) (1999) All Our Futures: Creativity; Culture and Education. Suffolk: Department for Education and Employment.

Nicholl B. (2007) Fixated on popular culture and other things: What students can tell us about generating ideas in D&T. IN Dakers; J. R.; Dow W. J.; and De Vries M. J. (eds.) PATT 18 Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research 2007. Glasgow: Faculty of Education.

Nicholl; B. & McLellan; R. (2007). The contribution of product analysis to fixation in students’ design and technology work. IN: Norman; E.W.L. and Spendlove; D. (eds.). The Design and Technology Association International Research Conference 2007. University of Wolverhampton. Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.

Trebell; D.; (2007) A literature Review in Search of an Appropriate Theoretical Perspective to Frame a Study of Designery Activity in Secondary Design and technology IN: Norman; E.W.L. and Spendlove; D. (eds.). The Design and Technology Association International Research Conference 2007. University of Wolverhampton; Telford Campus; 4;5;6 July. University of Wolverhampton. Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.

Twyford; J. & Burden; R. (2000) ‘Is It Really Work? Primary School Pupils’ Conceptions of Design and Technology as a National Curriculum Subject’. The Journal of Design and Technology Education; 5 (2). 101-105.

Citations in Crossref