Dag Fritzson
SKF Engineering Research Centre, Modelling & Simulation, Göteborg, Sweden
Jonas Ståhl
SKF Engineering Research Centre, Modelling & Simulation, Göteborg, Sweden
Iakov Nakhimovski
SKF Engineering Research Centre, Modelling & Simulation, Göteborg, Sweden
Ladda ner artikel
Ingår i: The 48th Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and Modeling (SIMS 2007); 30-31 October; 2007; Göteborg (Särö)
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 27:4, s. 24-39
Publicerad: 2007-12-21
ISBN:
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
Connectivity; i.e.; connecting different types of simulation tools; becomes increasingly important. The objective is to be able to do cost effective simulations of a large system by utilizing existing tools together. The TLM (Transmission Line Modelling) co-simulation technique is stable; does not have numerical problems; and is proven. It has potential for being a cosimulation technique of general usage. The aim of the paper is an evaluation of TLM technique for rolling bearing applications via a study of a grinding spindle model. The conclusion is that the results of TLM and non-TLM simulations are similar for a realistic application with rolling bearings and applicable for engineering purposes. The numerical stability and performance are satisfactory for the considered application.
[1] Modelica standard. http://www.modelica.org.
[2] MSC Software Corporation homepage. http://www.mscsoftware.com/.
[3] Fritzson; D.; Stacke; L.-E.; and Nordling; P. (1999) BEAST - a Rolling Bearing Simulation Tool. Proc. Instn Mech Engrs; Part K; 213; pp. 63-71; 1999
[4] Stacke; L.-E. and Fritzson; D. (2001). Dynamic behaviour of rolling bearings: simulations and experiments. Proc. Instn Mech Engrs; Part J; 213; pp. 499-508
[5] ABAQUS homepage. http://www.abaqus.com/.
[6] ANSYS solutions homepage. http://www.ansys.com/.
[7] Felippa; C.A.; Park; K. C. and Farhat; C.. (2001). Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems. Invited Plenary Lecture; 4th World Congress in Computational Mechanics; Buenos Aires; Argentina; July 1998; expanded version in Comp. Meth. Appl. Mechanics and Engineering.; 190; 3247-3270
[8] Hulbert; G.M.; Ma; Z.-D.; and Wang; J. (2005). Gluing for Dynamic Simulation of Distributed Mechanical Systems. In Jorge A.C. Ambrosio; editor; Advances in Computational Multibody Systems; pages 69–94. Springer.
[9] Veitl; A.; Gordon; T.; Van De Sand; A.; Howell; M.; Valasek; M.; Vaculin; O.; and Steinbauer; P.. (1999). Methodologies for coupling simulation models and codes in mechatronic system analysis and design. Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement; 33:231–243.
[10] Johns; P.B. and O’Brien; M. (1980). Use of the transmission-line modeling (t.l.m.) method to solve non-linear lumped networks. The Radio and Electronic Engineer; 50(1/2): 59–70; Jan/Feb 1980.
[11] Krus; P. (1999). Modelling of Mechanical Systems Using Rigid Bodies and Transmission Line Joints. Transactions of ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control.; Dec 1999.
[12] Krus; P. and Jansson; A. (1990). Distributed simulation of hydromechanical systems. In Third Bath International Fluid Power Workshop; Bath; UK.
[13] Pulko; S.H.; Mallik; A.; Allen; R.; and Johns; P.B. (1990). Automatic Timestepping in TLM Routines for the Modelling of Thermal Diffusion Processes. Int. Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks; Devices and Fields; 3:127-136; 1990.
[14] Auslander; D.M. (1968) Distributed System Simulation with Bilateral Delay-Line Models; Trans ASME J. Basic Eng; 1968; pp 195-200.
[15] Krus; P. (2000). Distributed Modelling for Simulation of Pneumatic Systems. Tech Report; Linköping University; 2000
[16] Mathworks homepage. http://www.mathworks.com/.
[17] Dynasim and Dymola homepage. http://www.dynasim.com/.
[18] Cosimate homepage. http://www.tni-world.com/cosimate.asp/.
[19] Kuhl; F.; Weatherly; R. and Dahmann; J. (2000). Creating Computer Simulation Systems. An Introduction to the High Level Architecture. Prentice Hall PTR; 2000
[20] Elliot; A.S. (2000). A Highly Efficient; General- Purpose Approach for Co-Simulation with ADAMS. MDI Inc; Nov 2000
[21] Elliot; A.S. (2002). Status Update on Advanced;General-Purpose Co-Simulation with ADAMS. MDI Inc; May 2002.
[22] Matthies; H.G. and Steindorf; J. (2002). Strong coupling methods (revised version). In Stuttgart Multifield Conference; Stuttgart; Germany; April 200
[23] Ben Gum; H.; Asada; H.; He; X. (2002). Software Development of Co-Simulation of Algebraically Coupled Dynamic Subsystems without Disclosure of Proprietary Subsystem Models; IMECE; New Orleans; Louisiana; Nov 2002
