Although computational tools play an increasingly important role in the humanities, adoption of tools by scholars does not always reach its potential. One approach to this problem is user re-search to uncover the needs of the users. However, it is uncertain whether such user requirements can be generalized to a wider group of humanities scholars, and whether users are able to explicate their requirements for methodological innovation. We ask what the role of user research is in the Digital Humanities by discussing gathered user requirements for two projects. We categorized the requirements as within- or out-of-scope of the projects’ goals, and found a tension between the specificity of humanities’ research methods, and generalizability for a broader applicable tool. With the out-of-scope requirements we are able to map the wider research work-flow, showing DH tools will most likely take a spot in the wider workflow, and that it is infeasible to create a tool for the entire workflow that is generic enough for a larger user group. However, the within-scope requirements led to features that were sufficiently generic for the tool to be adopted, also for unintended purposes. These insights show user research has a clear benefit for DH projects.
user research;user requirements;user-centred design;search user interfaces;repurposing data;digital humanities
Academia.nl. (n.d.). Hulp. Retrieved February 10, 2015, from http://www.academia.nl/faq/28341#t28345n1847
Sheila Anderson, Tobias Blanke, & Stuart Dunn. (2010). Methodological commons: arts and humanities e-Science fundamentals. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 368, 3779–3796. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0156
Marcia J. Bates. (1984). The Fallacy of the Perfect Thirty-Item Online Search. RQ, 24(1), 43–50.
David Benyon, Phil Turner, & Susan Turner. (2005). Designing interactive systems: People, activities, contexts, technologies. Pearson Education.
Tobias Blanke, & Mark Hedges. (2013). Scholarly primitives: Building institutional infrastructure for humanities e-Science. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(2), 654–661. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.06.006
Christine L. Borgman. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634
Christine L. Borgman. (2015). Big Data, Little Data, No Data (ebook). MIT Press.
John Bradley. (2005). What You (Fore)see is What You Get : Thinking About Usage Paradigms for Computer Assisted Text Analysis. TEXT Technology, 14(2).
DANS. (2012). Thematische collectie: Oral History. DANS. http://doi.org/10.17026/dansz3c-f26d
Delpher. (n.d.). Collecties. Retrieved February 10, 2015, from http://www.delpher.nl/nl/platform/pages?title=collecties
Jennifer Edmond, & Vicky Garnett. (2015). APIs and Researchers: The Emperor’s New Clothes? International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(1), 287–297. http://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.369
Charlie Edwards. (2012). The Digital Humanities and Its Users. In Matthew K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the Digital Humanities (online). University of Minnesota Press.
Fred Gibbs, & Trevor Owens. (2012). Building Better Digital Humanities Tools: Toward broader audiences and user-centered designs. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 6(2).
Jan Gulliksen, Bengt Göransson, Inger Boivie, Stefan Blomkvist, Jenny Persson, & Åsa Cajander. (2003). Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour& Information Technology, 22(6), 397–409. http://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001624329
Hubert F. Hofmann, & Franz Lehner. (2001). Requirements engineering as a success factor in software projects. IEEE Software, 18(August), 58–66. http://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2001.936219
Damir Juric, Laura Hollink, & Geert-jan Houben. (2013). Discovering links between political debates and media. In The 13th International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE’13). Aalborg, Denmark. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39200-9_30
Damir Juric, Laura Hollink, & GJ Houben. (2012). Bringing parliamentary debates to the Semantic Web. In DeRiVE workshop on Detection, Representation, and Exploitation of Events in the Semantic Web.
Eric C. Kansa, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, Margie M. Burton, & Cindy Stankowski. (2010).
Googling the Grey: Open Data, Web Services, and Semantics. Archaeologies, 6, 301–326. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-010-9146-4
Max Kemman, Martijn Kleppe, & Jim Maarseveen. (2013). Eye Tracking the Use of a Collapsible Facets Panel in a Search Interface. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (pp. 405–408). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3_47
Max Kemman, Martijn Kleppe, & Stef Scagliola. (2014a). Just Google It. In Clare Mills, Michael Pidd, & Esther Ward (Eds.), Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012. Sheffield, UK: HRI Online Publications.
Max Kemman, Stef Scagliola, Franciska de Jong, & Roeland Ordelman. (2014b). Talking with Scholars: Developing a Research Environment for Oral History Collections. In Lukasz Bolikowski, Vittore Casarosa, Paula Goodale, Nikos Houssos, Paolo Manghi,& Jochen Schirrwagen (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries -- TPDL 2013 Selected Workshops (Vol. 416, pp. 197–201). Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08425-1_22
Martijn Kleppe, Laura Hollink, Max Kemman, Damir Juric, Henri Beunders, Jaap Blom, Johan Oomen, & Geert-Jan Houben. (2014). PoliMedia - Analysing Media Coverage of Political Debates By Automatically Generated Links to Radio & Newspaper Items. In Mathieu D’Aquin, Stefan Dietze, Hendrik Drachsler, Marieke Guy, & Eelco Herder (Eds.), Proceedings of the LinkedUp Veni Competition on Linked and Open Data for Education. Geneva, Switzerland: CEUR-WS.
M. D. McIlroy, E. N. Pinson, & B. A. Tague. (1978). UNIX Time-Sharing System: Foreword.
Bell System Technical Journal, 57(6), 1899–1904. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1978.tb02135.x
Michael J. Muller. (2003). Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI. In Andrew Sears& Julie A. Jacko (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process (pp. 1051–1068). Routledge.
Jakob Nielsen. (2001). First Rule of Usability? Don’t Listen to Users. Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/first-rule-of-usability-dont-listen-to-users/
Donald A. Norman. (2010). The way I see it: Technology first, needs last. Interactions, 17(2), 38. http://doi.org/10.1145/1699775.1699784
Jasminko Novak, Isabel Micheel, Mark Melenhorst, Lars Wieneke, Marten During, Javier Garcia Moron, Chiara Pasini, Marco Tagliasacchi, & Piero Fraternali. (2014).
HistoGraph -- A Visualization Tool for Collaborative Analysis of Networks from Historical Social Multimedia Collections. In 2014 18th International Conference on Information Visualisation (pp. 241–250). IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2014.47
Roeland Ordelman, & Franciska De Jong. (2011). Distributed Access to Oral History collections: Fitting Access Technology to the needs of Collection Owners and Researchers. In Digital Humanities 2011. Stanford, USA.
Ewoud Sanders. (2014, April 14). Voor al haar mantelzorgen. NRC Handelsblad. Staten-Generaal Digitaal. (n.d.). Digitalisering. Retrieved February 10, 2015, from http://www.statengeneraaldigitaal.nl/overdezesite?document=digitalisering
Mark S. Sweetnam, Maristella Agosti, Nicola Orio, Chiara Ponchia, Christina M. Steiner, Eva-Catherine Hillemann, Micheál Ó Siochrú, & Séamus Lawless. (2012). User Needs for Enhanced Engagement with Cultural Heritage Collections. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7489 LNCS, pp. 64–75). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_8
John Unsworth. (2000). Scholarly Primitives: what methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this? In Symposium on Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice. King’s College, London.
Joris van Zundert. (2012). If you build it, will we come? Large scale digital infrastructures as a dead end for digital humanities. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 37(3), 165–186.
Claire Warwick. (2012). Studying users in digital humanities. In Claire Warwick, Melissa Terras, & Julianne Nyhan (Eds.), Digital humanities in practice (pp. 1–21). Facet Publishing.
Claire Warwick, M. Terras, Paul Huntington, & N. Pappa. (2007). If You Build It Will They Come? The LAIRAH Study: Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities through Statistical Analysis of User Log Data. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(1), 85–102. http://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm045
Martin Weller. (2011). The Digital Scholar (online ed). Bloomsbury Academic. http://doi.org/10.5040/9781849666275
