Optimal Control for Hydraulic System with Separate Meter-In and Separate Meter-Out

Gerhard Rath
University of Leoben, Chair of Automation, Leoben, Austria

Emil Zaev
SS. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Automation Department, Skopje, Macedonia

Ladda ner artikelhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp17144125

Ingår i: Proceedings of 15:th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, June 7-9, 2017, Linköping, Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 144:12, s. 125-134

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2017-12-20

ISBN: 978-91-7685-369-6

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)


Individual meter-in and meter-out proportional control of hydraulic cylinders allow more flexible strategies how to handle a payload while optimising certain aspects of the motion. An optimal control approach based on the Hamiltonian is used to plan a motion path for a separate meter-in and separate meter-out system. One goal is to avoid oscillations at the end of the motion in the sense of active vibration damping. With the mathematical model presented, it is possible to include the cylinder pressures into the optimisation goals. Not only the the final values for position and speed of the load can be acquired, but also desired values for the pressures at the end of the motion. Maintaining a minimum pressure level is important in order to avoid cavitation and to keep the stiffness of the system. The course of the pressures follows from the design of the motion and will reach the desired values in an open loop control. In order to estimate the computing effort, the algorithm was tested on three platforms. One of those is an ARM-based hardware that represents the computing power of modern embedded systems, to demonstrate that an implementation on such system is possible. Several motion experiments were carried out in simulation to study the behaviour and to discuss application issues.


Hydraulic actuator, optimal control, separate meter-in/separate meter-out


[1] D Wu. Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of a Load-Sensing and Pressure Compensated Hydraulic System. PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, 2003.

[2] J A Aardema et al. Systems and method for controlling an independent metering valve. United States Patent 5960695, 1999.

[3] B Eriksson. Control strategy for energy efficient fluid power actuators utilizing individual metering. Master’s thesis, Univ. of Linkoping, Linkoping, Sweden, 2007.

[4] K Heybroek. Saving energy in construction machinery using displacement control hydraulics-concept realization and validation. Master’s thesis, Univ. of Linkoping, Linkoping, Sweden, 2009.

[5] P Krus. On Load Sensing Fluid Power Systems with Special reference to Dynamic Properties and control Aspects. PhD thesis, Univ. of Linkoping, Linkoping, Sweden, 1988.

[6] P Krus and J-O Palmberg. Dampening of fluid power systems in machines with high inertia loads. In Proc. SICFP, Sweden, 1998.

[7] B Eriksson and J-O Palmberg. Individual metering fluid power systems: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 225(2):196–211, 2011.

[8] E Zaev, G Rath, and H Kargl. Energy efficient active vibration damping. In Proceedings of the SICFP2013, Linkoping Sweden, 2013.

[9] P Kasturi and P Dupont. Constrained optimal control of vibration dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 215(3):499 – 509, 1998.

[10] P Holobut. Time-optimal control of hydraulic manipulators with path constraints. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 43(3):523–538, 2005.

[11] Liu S-J, M-S Zhu, and J-F Zhou. Optimal control of hydraulic position system employing high speed on/off solenoid valve. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 7(1):46–48, 2000.

[12] F Liccardo, S Strano, and M Terzo. Real-time nonlinear optimal control of a hydraulic actuator. Engineering Letters, 21(4):241–246, 2013.

[13] M Goubej, R Škarda, and M Schlegel. Input shaping filters for the control of electrical drive with flexible load. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Process Control ’09, pages 595–601, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, 2009.

[14] N C Singer and W P Seering. Preshaping command inputs to reduce system vibration. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 112:76–82, 1990.

[15] J Bhatti, A Plummer, P Iravani, and M Sahinkaya. Implementation of closed loop signal shaping in a hydraulic system. In Mechatronics 2012: The 13th Mechatronics Forum International Conference, 2012.

[16] Eaton Hydraulics Group, Eden Prairie, USA. CMA200 Advanced Independent-Metering Mobile Valve, 2016. Technical guide.

[17] K J Aström and C Canudas de Wit. Revisiting the lugre friction model. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 28(6):101–114, 2008.

[18] G F Franklin, J D Powell, and M L Workman. Digital Control of Dynamic Systems. Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA, third edition, 1997.

[19] D E Kirk. Optimal Control Theory. Dover Publications, Inc., NY, USA, 2004.

[20] R W Lewis. Programming Industrial Control Systems Using IEC 1131-3. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1996.

[21] E A Lee and S A Seshia. Introduction to Embedded Systems - A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach. LeeSeshia. org, 2011.

[22] E Zaev. Hardware-In-The-Loop for real-time simulation of complex mechanical systems and their control. PhD thesis, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Macedonia, 2013.

[23] C Moler and C Van Loan. Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential of a matrix, twenty-five years later. SIAM Review, 45(1):3–49, 2003.

[24] G Rath and M Harker. Direct numerical solution of optimal control problems. In 2016 5th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), pages 304–308, June 2016.

Citeringar i Crossref