Media Suite: Unlocking Audiovisual Archives for Mixed Media Scholarly Research

Roeland Ordelman
Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision, University of Twente, The Netherlands

Liliana Melgar
Department of Media Studies, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Jasmijn Van Gorp
Department of Media and Culture Studies, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Julia Noordegraaf
Department of Media Studies, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: Selected papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2018, Pisa, 8-10 October 2018

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 159:14, s. 133-143

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2019-05-28

ISBN: 978-91-7685-034-3

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)


This paper discusses the rationale behind and approach towards the development of a research environment –the Media Suite– in a sustainable, dynamic, multi-institutional infrastructure that supports mixed media scholarly research with large audiovisual data collections and available multimedia context collections, serving media scholars and digital humanists in general.


Research infrastructure, Multimedia collections, Media scholars, Mixed media archives, Virtual research environment


Tobias Blanke and Mark Hedges. 2013. Scholarly primitives: Building institutional infrastructure for humanities e-science. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(2):654–661.

Marc Bron, Jasmijn Van Gorp, Frank Nack, Lotte Belice Baltussen, and Maarten de Rijke. 2013. Aggregated search interface preferences in multi-session search tasks. In SIGIR ’13: 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, July.

Marc Bron, Jasmijn Van Gorp, and Maarten de Rijke. 2016. Media studies research in the data-driven age: How research questions evolve. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7):1535–1554.

Victor De Boer, Johan Oomen, Oana Inel, Lora Aroyo, Elco Van Staveren,Werner Helmich, and Dennis De Beurs. 2015. Dive into the event-based browsing of linked historical media. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 35:152–158.

Franciska de Jong, Roeland Ordelman, and Stef Scagliola. 2011. Audio-visual collections and the user needs of scholars in the humanities: a case for co-development. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Supporting Digital Humanities, November.

FG Hoekstra, Marijn Koolen, and Marijke van Faassen. 2018. Data scopes: towards transparent data research in digital humanities. Digital Humanities 2018 Puentes-Bridges.

Marijn Koolen, Jasmijn van Gorp, and Jacco van Ossenbruggen. 2018. Toward a model for digital tool criticism: Reflection as integrative practice. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities.

Liliana Melgar, Marijn Koolen, Hugo Huurdeman, and Jaap Blom. 2017. A process model of scholarly media annotation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR ’17, pages 305–308, New York, NY, USA. ACM.

Liliana Melgar, Marijn Koolen, Kaspar van Beelen, Hugo Huurdeman, Mari Wigham, Carlos Martínez Ortíz, and Roeland Ordelman. 2019. The CLARIAH Media Suite: a hybrid approach to system design in the humanities. In CHIIR 2019: ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

Liliana Melgar Estrada and Marijn Koolen. 2018. Audiovisual media annotation using qualitative data analysis software: A comparative analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(13):40–60.

Franco Moretti. 2013. Distant reading. Verso Books, London.

Roeland J.F. Ordelman and Franciska M.G. de Jong. 2011. Distributed access to oral history collections: Fitting access technology to the needs of collection owners and researchers. In Digital Humanities 2011: Conference Abstracts, pages 347–349. Stanford University Library.

Roeland Ordelman and Arjan van Hessen. 2018. Speech recognition and scholarly research: Usability and sustainability. In CLARIN 2018 Annual Conference, pages 163–168.

Robert Sanderson, Paolo Ciccarese, and Benjamin Young. 2017. Web annotation data model. W3C Candidate Recommendation.

Arnold WM Smeulders, Marcel Worring, Simone Santini, Amarnath Gupta, and Ramesh Jain. 2000. Contentbased image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 22(12):1349–1380.

John Unsworth. 2000. Scholarly primitives: What methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this. In Symposium on Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice. King’s College, London, volume 13, pages 5–00.

Henk Van Den Heuvel, Ren´e Van Horik, Stef Scagliola, Eric Sanders, and PaulaWitkamp. 2010. The veterantapes: Research corpus, fragment processing tool, and enhanced publications for the e-humanities. In LREC.

Jasmijn Van Gorp, Sonja de Leeuw, Justin van Wees, and Bouke Huurnink. 2015. Digital media archaeology: Digging into the digital tool avresearcherxl. VIEW. Journal of European Television History and Culture/Ejournal, 4(7):38–53.

Mari Wigham, Liliana Melgar Estrada, and Roeland Ordelman. 2018. Jupyter Notebooks for generous archive interfaces. In IEEE Big Data 2018: 3rd Computational Archival Science (CAS) Workshop, Seattle, WA.

Citeringar i Crossref