Konferensartikel

Differences in Thinking Styles among Low-; Average-; and High-Achieving College Students

Mohamed A. Albaili
United Arab Emirates University

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: The 13th International Conference on Thinking Norrköping; Sweden June 17-21; 2007

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 21:1, s. 5-10

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2007-07-20

ISBN:

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in thinking styles among low-; average-; and high-achieving United Arab Emirates college students. Thinking Styles Inventory was used to assess students thinking styles. Results indicated that low-achieving students scored significantly lower on Executive; Hierar¬chical; Anarchic; Local; Conservative; and Internal styles. Low-achieving students scored significantly higher on Legislative; Oligarchic; and Liberal styles. A discriminant analysis revealed that Executive and Conservative styles were the most discriminating factors that separated low-achieving students from their high-achieving peers.

Nyckelord

Thinking styles; academic achievement; college students

Referenser

ALBAILI, M. A. (2006). Reliability and Validity of the Thinking Styles Inventory: Evidence from United Arab Emirates. Proceedings of the 2006 Joint Annual Conference of the Australian psychological Society and New Zealand Psychological Society, Auckland, New Zealand, 26-30 September, 2006.

ARMSTRONG, S. J. (2000). The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology, 20, 323-339.

BERNARDO, A. B., ZHANG, L. R, & CALLUENG, C. M. (2002). Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163,149-163.

CANO-GARCIA, F., & HUGHES, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology , 20 (4), 413-430.

GRIGORENKO, E. L. & STERNBERG, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic achievement. Exceptional Children, 63, 295-312.

STERNBERG, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development Human Development, 31, 197-224.

STERNBERG, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.

STERNBERG, R. J., & WAGNER, R. K. (1992). Thinking Styles Inventory. (Unpublished test, Yale University).

ZHANG, L. F. (2000). Relationship between Thinking Styles Inventory and Study Process Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 29: 841–856.

ZHANG, L. F. (2001). Do styles of thinking matter among Hong Kong secondary school students? Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 289-301.

ZHANG, L. F. (2002). Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 22, 331-438.

ZHANG, L. F. (2004). Revisiting the Predictive Power of Thinking Styles for Academic Performance. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 351-370

ZHANG, L. F., & STERNBERG, R. J. (1998). Thinking styles, abilities, and academic achievement among Hong Kong university students. Educational Research Journal, 13, 41–62.

 ZHANG, L. F. & STERNBERG, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. The Journal of Psychology, 134, 469-489.

Citeringar i Crossref