Konferensartikel

A Historical Perspective on The Relationship Between Firm and The Market

Federico Brunetti
University of Verona, Italy

Ladda ner artikelhttp://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=033;article=074

Ingår i: 11th QMOD Conference. Quality Management and Organizational Development Attaining Sustainability From Organizational Excellence to SustainAble Excellence; 20-22 August; 2008 in Helsingborg; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 33:74, s. 879-896

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2008-12-09

ISBN:

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: The paper aims to consider the different ways the firm-marketplace relationship has gone through over time in order; on one hand; to develop some interpretive reasoning and; on the other hand; to introduce some questions able to direct future research.

Methodology/Approach: A conceptual approach is taken; trying to provide an understanding of the long-term changings that took place in the firm-marketplace relationship in its first part; and to raise some relevant issues about the evolution to come in is second part.

Findings: In the firm-marketplace relationship evolution five significant stages are to be found: product and selling orientation; marketing orientation; total quality management; one-to-one/relationship marketing; experience economy.

So; if one looks retrospectively and on the whole at the evolution occurred in the above mentioned relationship through the different stages; it’s quite easy to realize that a shift took place from:

  • mass to individual as supply’s addressee
  • unsatisfied needs to sensations to be felt as customer’s end
  • goods and things to services and experiences as transaction’s core in a context of ever growing supply’s quantity; variety; quality and accessibility.
From an interpretive point of view; it seems that business firm and capitalistic system got to highest degree of development and of exploitation of their potential; at least if no change of paradigm is assumed.

As a matter of fact; it seems really hard to imagine for almost any product a more plentiful marketplace; a greater choice among alternative offers; a superior technical performance; an easier purchase availability; a higher customization; a stronger perceived utility and satisfaction.

As long as such analysis proves right; it’s quite logical to conclude that the ongoing paradigm has reached its possible maximum outcome. If so; it becomes reasonable to hypothesize the rising of a new paradigm in the firm-marketplace relationship; considerably different from the actual one.

(Not) to conclude; some insightful questions for discussion and future research could be:

  • how much frequent is a product shortage situation?
  • what can be products’ quality level?
  • is it harder to choose because of too many alternatives or too little ones?
  • what can be there beyond a brand able to provide even love?
  • how come business ethics and corporate social responsibility are so popular topics of discussion today both among academics and practitioners?
  • how come consumption-wellbeing relationship; happiness or; better; happiness paradox are getting more and more attention nowadays?
  • how can simplicity-oriented lifestyle choices and growing number of anti-business movements be explained?
  • are there any weak signals of innovative firm behaviour detectable?
  • what is the direction such changings are pointing to?
Limitation/implication: As the paper provides a personal interpretation of what happened and is going on from the firm-marketplace perspective; anyone could object or at least non completely agree with such an interpretation.

Originality/Value: The paper tries to take in and to relate to the managerial field some broad issues often discussed in civil; social and economic realm. While firms are deeply involved in the actual state of capitalism and society at large; it seems no equivalent contribution has been made by management scholars in order to find a more suitable role for the firm.

Nyckelord

Firm-marketplace relationship; evolution; paradigm shift; new firm models

Referenser

Baccarani C.; Giaretta E.; (2000); “Evoluzione degli orientamenti d’impresa e scelte etiche di marketing”; nei Proceedings del Convegno Le Tendenze del Marketing in Europa; Venezia; 24-25 Novembre

Balmer J.M.T.; Greyser S.A.; (2003); Revealing the corporation: perspectives on identity; image; reputation; corporate branding; and corporate-level marketing; Routledge; London New York

Bauman Z.; (2002); La società sotto assedio; Laterza; Roma-Bari

Belk R.W.; (1988); “Possession and the Extended Self”; Journal of Consumer Research; vol. 15; September

Collesei U.; (2006); Marketing; Cedam; Padova

Cova B.; Badot O.& Bucci A.; (2006); “Beyond Marketing: In Praise of Societing”; http://visionarymarketing.com

Csikszentmihalyi M.; (2007); Buon Business. Successo economico e comportamento etico; Il Sole 24 Ore; Milano

Easterlin R.; (1974); “Does Economic Growth Improve Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence”; in Davis P.A.; Reder M.W. (a cura di); Nation and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz; Academic Press; New York London

Easterbrook G.; (2004); The Progress Paradox. How Life Gets Better While People Feel Worse; Random House; New York

Fabris G.; (2003); Il nuovo consumatore: verso il postmoderno; Franco Angeli; Milano

Fabris G.; (2008); Societing: il marketing nella società postmoderna; Egea; Milano

Fuat Firat A.; Dholakia N.; Venkatesh A; (1995); “Marketing in a postmodern world”; European Journal of Marketing; vol. 29; n. 1

Galgano A.; (1990); La Qualità Totale; Il Sole 24 Ore Libri; Milano

Goleman D.; (2006); Intelligenza sociale; Rizzoli; Milano

Grönroos C.; (1994); “From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing”; Management Decision; vol. 32; no. 2

Gummesson E.; (1987); “The New Marketing – Developing Long-term Interactive Relationships”; Long Range Planning; Vol. 20; No. 4
Kotler P.; Scott W.G.; (1993); Marketing Management; Isedi; Torino

Latouche S.; (2008); Breve trattato sulla decrescita serena; Bollati Boringhieri; Torino

Lee D.-J.; Sirgy J.M.; (2004); “Quality-of-Life (QOL) Marketing: Proposed Antecedents and Consequences”; Journal of Macromarketing; vol. 24; no. 1; June

Nassim N.T.; (2008); Il cigno nero. Come l’improbabile governa la nostra vita; Il Saggiatore; Milano

Pine II B.J.; Gilmore J.H.; (2000); Oltre il servizio. L’economia delle esperienze; Etas; Milano

Prahalad C.K.; (2007); La fortuna alla base della piramide: sconfiggere la povertà e realizzare profitti; Il Mulino; Bologna

Prandelli E.; Verona G.; (2006); Marketing in rete. Oltre Internet verso il nuovo Marketing; McGraw-Hill; Milano

Prandelli E.; von Krogh G.; (2000); “Fare leverage sulla conoscenza tacita dei consumatori: verso una nuova economia cognitiva“; Sinergie; n. 51

Rajan R.G.; Zingales L.; (2004); Salvare il capitalismo dai capitalisti; Einaudi; Torino

Raju J.S.; (2005); “Revitalizing the Role of Marketing in Business Organizations: What Can Poor Academics Do to Help?” in “Marketing Renaissance: Opportunities and Imperatives for Improving Marketing Thought; Practice; and Infrastructure”; Journal of Marketing; vol. 69; October

Roberts K.; (2004); Lovemarks: il futuro oltre i brands; Mondadori; Milano

Roberts K.; (2007); Effetto Lovemarks. Vincere nella rivoluzione dei consumi; Franco Angeli; Milano

Rullani E.; (2005); “Valori d’impresa e conoscenza in un contesto ambientale a complessità crescente”; Sinergie; n. 67

Schkade D.A.; Kahneman D.; (1998); “Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction”; Psychological Science; 9 (5)

Schmitt B.H.; (1999); “Experiential Marketing“; Journal of Marketing Management; vol. 15

Schwartz B.; (2005); The Paradox of Choice: why more is less; Harper Collins; New York

Scitovsky T.; (2007); L’economia senza gioia; Città Nuova; Roma

Sheth J.N.; Parvatiyar A.; (1995); “The Evolution of Relationship Marketing”; International Business Review; Vol. 4; No. 4

Sheth J.N.; Sisodia R.S.; (2005); “Does Marketing Need Reform?” in “Marketing Renaissance: Opportunities and Imperatives for Improving Marketing Thought; Practice; and Infrastructure”; Journal of Marketing; vol. 69; October

Sirgy J.M.; Lee D.-J.; (2008); “Well-being Marketing: An Ethical Business Philosophy for Consumer Goods Firms”; Journal of Business Ethics; no. 77

Siri G.; (2001); La psiche del consumo: consumatori; desiderio e identità; Franco Angeli; Milano

Stanton W.J.; Varaldo R.; (1986); Marketing; Il Mulino; Bologna

von Hippel E.; (1982); “Getting new products from customers”; Harvard Business Review; March-April

von Hippel E.; (1986); “Lead users: a source of novel product concepts”; Management Science; vol. 32; no. 7

Wilkie W.L.; Moore E.S.; (2003); “Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the ‘4 Eras’ of Thought Development”; Journal of Public Policy and Marketing; Vol. 22; Fall

Zuboff S.; Maxmin J.; (2002); The support economy: why corporations are failing individuals and the next episode of capitalism; Penguin; New York

Citeringar i Crossref