Growing Biomass Fuel Industry; Declining Local Forage Demands; and Changing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US Agriculture: A Case Study

Paul W. Gallagher
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA

Jeremiah Richey
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA

Ladda ner artikelhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp11057343

Ingår i: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:46, s. 343-350

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2011-11-03

ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)


This paper investigates the effect of a biomass crop introduction in a local market where field crops; cattle forage and biomass crops compete for the agricultural resources and determine land use. A simulation study for a State in the US (Minnesota) with extensive and diverse agricultural resources that could also support a biomass industry is reported. Local market impact on prices and land use is summarized. A local biofuel industry with 1.0 billion gallon capacity can transform declining local land values to stable or moderately increasing land values; partly because secular declines in cattle forage can be replaced with biofuel demands. The effects of greenhouse gas emissions and sinks are also estimated. The local agriculture sectors’ net greenhouse gas changes are converted from a net emission to a net sink position with a biofuels industry-we calculate an annual net improvement of 55 bil. Lbs CO2 –equivalent; due; in part; declining cattle emissions and favorable land use effects from expanding hay production.


Land rent; Land Use; livestock emissions; Switchgrass; Greenhouse gas(GHG)


[1] J. Fargione; J. Hill; D. Tilman; S. Polasky; P. Hawthorne; Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt; Science; Vol 319; 29 February 2008; p.1235-1238. doi: 10.1126/science.1152747.

[2] P. Gallagher; P. and H. Shapouri; Biomass Crop and Ethanol Supply from Agricultural Lands in the United States; AER No. 844; U.S.. Dept. of Agriculture; Nov. 2008.

[3] M. Wang; Y.Wu; and A. Elgowainy; The Greenhouse Gases; Regulated Emissions; and Energy Use in Transportation Model;’ Operating Manual for GREET: Version 1.7; Center for Transportation Research; Argonne National Laboratory; http://www.transportation.anl.gov/software/ Greet/index.html; February 2007.

[4] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Reference Manual (Volume 3) Agriculture; 1997. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs6c.html

[5] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Reference Manual (Volume 3) Land Use Change and Forestry;1997.

[6] J C Henning; Big Bluestem; Indiangrass and Switchgrass; University of Missouri Extension G4673 October 1993;

[7] KJ Goddard and JWalton; Switchgrass for Biofuels University of Tennessee Biofuels Initiative; October 10; 2007.

[8] Interagency Agricultural Projections Committee; USDA Agricultural Projections to 2019; Long-term porojections report OCE-2010-1; February 2010.

[9] PW Gallagher; Corn Ethanol Growth in the US without Adverse Foreign Land Use Change: Defining Limits and Devising Policies; Biofuels; Bioproducts; and Biorefining; May/June 2010.

[10] PW Gallagher; A look at US-Brazil ethanol trade and policy; Biofuels; Bioproducts; and Biorefining; September 2007.

Citeringar i Crossref