Alan C. Brent
Centre for Renewable and Sustainable Energy Studies, School of Public Leadership, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Wildri D. Peach
Sustainable Energy Futures, Natural Resources and the Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa \ Graduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
William Stafford
Sustainable Energy Futures, Natural Resources and the Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa
Ladda ner artikel
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110572292Ingår i: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:2, s. 2292-2299
Publicerad: 2011-11-03
ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
The impacts of technologies on sustainability have to be assessed through structured approaches to provide decision-makers with strategic information. Traditional technology assessment methods can be complex and highly resource intensive with long lead times; consequently; the applications of these methods are limited; especially in Africa. Where these methods have been applied; the conclusions that are generated are also not always effectively communicated; which leads to limited buy-in from stakeholders. The paper therefore proposes a generic rapid technology assessment framework and implementation process that utilises a popular method that has been modified to include sustainability factors and a systems approach; while remaining simple and intuitive: the Sustainable Technology Balance Sheet (STBS). The method addresses technology assessment from a qualitative view by including sustainability criteria developed through stakeholder engagement and technical factors through expert opinion; while inducing a life cycle approach to ensure system awareness. A case study approach; using a bioenergy value chain; is used to demonstrate the developed STBS method.
[1] H. Bossel; Indicators for sustainable development: Theory; method; applications; A Report to the Balaton Group; IISD; Canada; 1999.
[2] M.W. Pretorius; G. de Wet; A model for the assessment of new technology for the manufacturing enterprise; Technovation 20(1); 2000; pp. 3-10.
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00092-9.
[3] G. de Wet; Corporate strategy and technology management: Creating the interface; Graduate School of Technology Management; University of Pretoria; 1992.
[4] H.K. Grover; H.K.; M.W. Pretorius; The technology assessment of demand side bidding in the South African context; South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 19(2); 2008; pp. 93-108.
[5] R.K. Singh; H.R. Murty; S.K. Gupta; A.K. Dikshit; An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies; Ecological Indicators 9; 2008; pp. 189–212.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011.
[6] W.D. Peach; The development of the Sustainable Technology Balance Sheet: A generic technology assessment tool to assess the sustainability of renewable energy technologies; Masters dissertation; Graduate School of Technology Management; University of Pretoria; 2010.
