Sawas C. Theodorou
Brunel University, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Georgios Florides
Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos, Cyprus
Savvas A. Tassou
Brunel University, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Ladda ner artikel
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110572618Ingår i: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:44, s. 2618-2625
Publicerad: 2011-11-03
ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
The increasing environmental concerns and energy issues required for a sound design of decision patterns increased the parameters to be considered in deciding and developing an efficient energy strategy through the optimisation of support schemes for renewable energy technology. The correct identification and evaluation of the decision making parameters leads amongst others to correct political decisions for maximising the benefit of investment cost; social and environmental gains and improvement of technologies. The paper is focussed in analysing the parameters to be used in a Multiple Criteria Decision Making method and in suggesting a ranking scale for the parameters to be ued in drafting their weights. Fourteen parameters were selected and analysed. The analysis is contacted through literature review; personal communication with key personnel and through questionnaires.
[1] Huang; L; The global trend of green procurement. QualityMagazine 44 (8); 2008; pp. 36–40.
[2] M. Beccali; M. Cellura M. Mistretta; 2003;. Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology; Renewable Energy 28; 2003; pp. 2063–2087
doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00102-2.
[3] Peter Lund; Market penetration rates of new energy technologies; Energy Policy 34; 2006 pp. 3317–3326
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.07.002.
[4] Bert J.M. de Vriesa;_; Detlef P. van Vuurenb; Monique M. Hoogwijka; Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach; Energy Policy 35; 2007; pp. 2590–2610
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002.
[5] T.J. Hammons; Integrading Renewable Energy sources into European grids. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 20; 2008; pp. 462-475
doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2008.04.010.
[6] Skoglund; M. Leijon; A. Rehn; M. Lindahl; R. Waters; On the physics of power; energy and economics of renewable electric energy sources - Part II Renewable Energy 35; 2010; pp. 1735–1740
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.031.
[7] D. Popp; I. Hascic N. Medhi; Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy; Energy Economics; 2010; Article in Press.
[8] C. Fischer and R. Newell; Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Change and Renewable Energy Discussion Paper 04-05; resource for the future; 2004
[9] F. Evrendilek; C. Ertekin; Assessing the potential of renewable energy sources in Turkey Renewable Energy 28; 2003; pp. 2303–2315
[10] Y-C Shen; T.R. Grace; K-P Li; J.C. Yuan; An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology Energy Policy 38; 2010; pp. 4604–4616
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.016.
[11] I. Falconett; K. Nagasaka; Comparative analysis of support mechanisms for renewable energy technologies using probability distributions; Renewable Energy 35; 2010; pp. 1135–1144
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.11.019.
[12] D. Weisser; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8; 2004; pp. 101–127
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2003.10.002.
[13] K. Venetsanos; P. Angelopoulou; T. Tsoutsos; Renewable energy sources project appraisal under uncertainty: the case of wind energy exploitation within a changing energy market environment;. Energy Policy 30; 2002; pp. 293–307.
doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00096-9.
[14] P. Komor; M. Bazilian; Renewable energy policy goals; programs; and technologies; Energy Policy 33; 2005; pp. 1873–1881
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.03.003.
