Channelling Norwegian Hydropower Towards Greener Currents: The Challenge of Conflicting Environmental Concerns?

Jørgen K. Knudsen
SINTEF Energy Research, Norway

Helene Egeland
SINTEF Energy Research, Norway

Gerd B. Jacobsen
SINTEF Energy Research, Norway

Audun Ruud
SINTEF Energy Research, Norway

William M. Lafferty
SINTEF Energy Research, Norway

Ladda ner artikelhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110572674

Ingår i: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:51, s. 2674-2681

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2011-11-03

ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)


Nearly 100 percent of electricity used in Norway stems from hydropower; but no further large-scale production is politically viable. There is however increased interest in hydropower as both a supplement to the national energy supply and as provider of balance within the European energy system. Interest focuses on: (1) increased pumping and storage; (2) upgrading of existing hydropower installations; and (3) small-scale hydro production. Such measures are also considered as climate-change mitigation. As a fourth developmental path there are also alternative processes aiming at reinforcing environmental concerns in existing hydropower; not least by revising granted licenses. These processes coincide with a reinforced focus on biodiversity. This dual environmental challenge is also enhanced by Norway’s follow-up of the EU Directive on renewable energy (RES) and the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). In this context; we here assess current political and regulatory practice in Norway; focusing on the status of environmental concerns; and the challenges Norwegian hydropower policy faces by the implementation of the EU Directives. The policy challenge is manifest as ‘tradeoffs’ among hydropower priorities at both the strategic and project-specific levels; and is further enhanced by lack of clarity as to the ultimate impact of the relevant EU Directives.


EU; Renewable Energy Directive; Water Framework Directive; Norwegian hydropower; policy; governance; Environmental Policy Integration (EPI); trade-off


[1] White Paper 37; 2000-01; On hydropower and the power balance (in Norwegian); Oslo: Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (MoPE).

[2] OJEC; Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. In Official Journal of the European Communities (OJEC); 22 Dec. 2000; L 327/1.

[3] OJEU; Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. In Official Journal of the European Union; 5 June 2009; L 140/16.

[4] H. Egeland & G.B. Jacobsen; On the case studies of Laudal and Iveland (in Norwegian); Technical Report; Trondheim: SINTEF Energy Research; 2011a; forthcoming.

[5] H. Egeland; H. & G.B. Jacobsen; On the case studies of Suldalslågen and Aura (in Norwegian); Technical Report; Trondheim: SINTEF Energy Research; 2011b; forthcoming.

[6] J.K. Knudsen; Norwegian hydropower management and the integration of environmental concerns; Technical Report; Trondheim: SINTEF Energy Research; 2011; forthcoming.

[7] CEC; Consolidated Version on the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union; in Official Journal of the European Union; C 115/47; 9 May 2009. Brussels: The European Communities.

[8] J.K. Knudsen; Environmental Policy Integration: Conceptual clarification and comparative analysis of standards and mechanisms; Dissertation submitted to obtain the degree of Doctor. Enschede: University of Twente; 2009.

[9] W.M. Lafferty & E. Hovden; Environmental Policy Integration: Towards an Analytical Framework; Environmental Politics; Volume 12; Issue 3; 2003; pp. 1 – 22. doi: 10.1080/09644010412331308254.

[10] A.J. Jordan & A. Lenschow (eds); Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainability; Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar; 2008. doi: 10.4337/9781848445062.

[11] W.M. Lafferty (ed.); Governance for Sustainable Development; Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar; 2004. doi: 10.4337/9781845421700.

[12] W.M. Lafferty & A. Ruud A. (eds); Promoting Sustainable Electricity in Europe: Challenging the Path Dependency of Dominant Energy Systems; Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar; 2008.

[13] A. Ruud & J.K. Knudsen; Renewable energy policy making in the EU: What has been the role of Norwegian stakeholders?; Teknisk Rapport TR A6860; Trondheim: SINTEF Energy Research AS; 2009.

[14] J. Knudsen; A. Ruud & O.M. Larsen; Norway: Promoting new renewables in a hydrobased petroleum economy’; in W.M. Lafferty and A. Ruud (eds): Promoting Sustainable Electricity in Europe: Challenging the Path Dependency of Dominant Energy Systems. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar; 2008; pp. 250-278.

[15] Ministry of the Environment; Royal decree approving regional management plans according to the WFD Directive (in Norwegian); Oslo: Ministry of the Environment; 2009.

[16] Committee Recommendations 145; Innstilling fra energi- og miljøkomiteen om norsk klimapolitikk (in Norwegian). Oslo: Parliament; 2008.

Citeringar i Crossref