M. Imroz Sohel
Scion, Te Papa Tipu Innovation Park, Rotorua, New Zealand
Mathieu Sellier
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Susan Krumdieck
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Ladda ner artikel
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110571241Ingår i: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:2, s. 1241-1248
Publicerad: 2011-11-03
ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
Geothermal power plants are designed for optimal utilization of geothermal resource. However; geothermal fields typically undergo significant changes in resource characteristics such as pressure; temperature and steam quality over their life span. With appropriate reservoir modelling it is possible to predict the future resource characteristics of a geothermal field to a reasonable degree of accuracy. We propose a new adaptive design approach that would allow geothermal power plants to take into account the change of resource characteristics that occur over a 30-40 years time horizon based on the results of reservoir modelling. Currently; it is difficult and expensive to modify or renovate an existing plant due to space constraints; piping arrangements; transportation of machinery etc. The adaptive design approach would allow cost effective modifications in operation and equipment to adjust to changes in resource characteristics in the future. A simple model for a typical combined cycle geothermal power plant is considered as a test case for the adaptive design approach. Simulation is carried out using changes in both wellhead specific enthalpy and mass flow rate. There are four case studies presented in this paper that analysed various possible options of the hypothetical power plant depending on the changes in resource characteristics. Taking into account the results of the simulation; alternative plant designs are presented and improvements in performance are discussed. Although; the initial investment cost might go up as a consequence of adaptive design; over the life span of the plant the total benefit may be greater.
Geothermal power; resource characteristics change; adaptive design; low temperature power source.
[1] IEA; World Energy Outlook. 2008: International Energy Agency.
[2] Barbier; E.; Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews; 2002. 6(1-2): p. 3-65.
doi: 10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00002-3.
[3] DiPippo; R.; Second Law assessment of binary plants generating power from low-temperature geothermal fluids. Geothermics; 2004. 33(5): p. 565-586.
doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2003.10.003.
[4] Chen; H.; D.Y. Goswami; and E.K. Stefanakos; A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews; 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.006.
[5] Bombarda; P. and M. Gaia. Geothermal Binary Plants Utilising an Innovative Non-Flammable Azeotropic Mixture as Working Fluid. in Proceedings 28th NZ Geothermal Workshop. 2006.
[6] Madhawa Hettiarachchi; H.D.; et al.; Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources. Energy; 2007. 32(9): p. 1698-1706.
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.005.
[7] DiPippo; R.; Ideal thermal efficiency for geothermal binary plants. Geothermics; 2007. 36(3): p. 276-285.
doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2007.03.002.
[8] Sohel; M.I. and M. Jack; Efficiency improvements by geothermal heat integration in a lignocellulosic biorefinery. Bioresource Technology; 2010. 101 p. 9342-9347.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.011.
[9] Sohel; M.I.; et al.; An iterative method for modelling the air-cooled organic Rankine cycle geothermal power plant. International Journal of Energy Research; 2010. DOI: 10.1002/er.1706
doi: 10.1002/er.1706.
[10] Sohel; M.I.; et al.; Dynamic Modelling and Simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle Unit of a Geothermal Power Plant. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010 Bali; Indonesia; 25-29 April 2010.
[11] Atrens; A.D.; H. Gurgenci; and V. Rudolph; Electricity generation using a carbon-dioxide thermosiphon. Geothermics; 2010. 39(2): p. 161-169.
doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2010.03.001.
[12] Atrens; A.D.; H. Gurgenci; and V. Rudolph; CO2 Thermosiphon for Competitive Geothermal Power Generation. Energy & Fuels; 2008. 23(1): p. 553-557.
doi: 10.1021/ef800601z.
[13] DiPippo; R.; Geothermal Power Plants: Principles; Applications and Case Studies. 2005: Elsevier Ltd.
[14] RJVL; ROTOKAWA GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT Resource Consent Applications and Assessment of Environmental Effects. 2007; Rotokawa Joint Venture Limited; C/- Mighty River Power Limited; 160 Peachgrove Road; PO Box 445; HAMILTON; New Zealand.
[15] MathWorks; www.mathworks.com. 2008.
[16] REFPROP. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2007. Available from: http://www.nist.gov/.
