Konferensartikel

Energy and Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Double Flash Power Plant for Meshkin Shahr Region

Mohammad Ameri
Energy Eng. Department, Power & Water University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Saman Amanpour
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Saeid Amanpour
Department of Electrical Engineering, University Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

Ladda ner artikelhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110571297

Ingår i: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:9, s. 1297-1304

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2011-11-03

ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

One of the most influential improvements in geothermal industries has been the application of double flash power plants which can produce more power in comparison with single flash one. Although it is more expensive; however it is a reasonable option as the additional output power can justify the prices. The aim of this study is to represent a methodology in which a double flash power plant is thermodynamically designed and optimized in order to maximize the output power; and make a comparison with other possible type of geothermal power plant (single flash) for Meshkin Shahr region. Besides it represents the study of exergy and energy analysis for plant components through the optimization process; which can guide one to assess the operating status of plant components. It has been shown that flash vessels are the greatest exergy dissipaters and double flash power plant can be more efficient than single flash for this region.

Nyckelord

Double Flash Power Plant; Geothermal Power Plant; Energy Analysis; Exergy Analysis; Optimization

Referenser

[1] M. Yari; Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants; Renewable Energy 35; 2010; pp. 112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.023.

[2] M. Kanoglu; A. Bolatturk; Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy; Renewable Energy 33; 2008; pp. 2366-2374. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.01.017.

[3] R. DiPippo; Geothermal power plants; Elsevier Ltd; 2nd Edition; 2007; pp. 191-251 & 102-104 & 241-247.

[4] M. Ameri; S.R. Shamshirgaran; M. Pour Yousefi; The Study of Key Thermodynamic Parameters Effect on the Performance of a Flash Steam Geothermal Power Plant; Proceeding of 2nd Joint Int. Conference SEE 2006; Bangkok; 2006; B-004 (O).

[5] V. Stefansson; Investment cost for geothermal power plants; Geothermics 31; 2002; pp. 263-272. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6505(01)00018-9.

[6] M. Ameri; S. Amanpour; S. Amanpour; Energy and exergy analysis of Mehkin-Shahr single flash geothermal power plant; Proceeding of 10th International Conference on Clean Energy (ICCE-2010); 2010; No. 12-08.

[7] N. Y. Ozcan; G. Gokcen; Thermodynamic assessment of gas removal systems for single-flash geothermal power plants; Applied Thermal Engineering 29; 2009; pp. 3246-3253. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2009.04.031.

[8] A. Dagdas; R. Ozturk; S. Bekdemir; Thermodynamic evaluation of Denizli Kizildere geothermal power plant and its performance improvement; Energy Conversion and Management 46; 2005; pp. 245-256. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.02.021.

[9] A. Franco; M. Villani; Optimal design of binary cycle power plants for water-dominated; medium-temperature geothermal fields; Geothermics 38; 2009; pp. 379-391. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2009.08.001.

[10] M. Kanoglu; Exergy analysis of a dual-level binary geothermal power plant; Geothermics 31; 2002; pp. 709-724. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6505(02)00032-9.

[11] R. DiPippo; Second Law assessment of binary plants generating power from low-temperature geothermal fluids; Geothermics 33; 2004; pp. 565-586. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2003.10.003.

[12] Y. Cerci; Performance evaluation of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli; Turkey; Energy 28; 2003; pp. 27-35. doi: 10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00093-2.

[13] U. Serpen; Comments on Performance evaluation of single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli; Turkey; Energy 29; 2004; pp. 1219-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.02.029.

[14] Y. Cerci; Response to comments on "Performance evaluation of single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli; Turkey"; Energy 29; 2004; pp. 1225-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.02.030.

[15] U. Serpen; Reply to the author’s response to comments on "Performance evaluation of single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli; Turkey"; Energy 29; 2004; pp.1227-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.02.029.

[16] H.D. Madhawa Hettiarachchi; M. Golubovic; M. Worek William; Y. Ikegami; Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources; Energy 32; 2007; pp. 1698-1706. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.005.

[17] M. Kanoglu; I. Dincer; A. Rosen Mark; Understanding energy and exergy efficiencies for improved energy management in power plants; Energy Policy 35; 2007; pp. 3967-3978. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.015.

[18] I. Dincer; M. Rosen; Exergy; Elsevier Ltd; 2007; pp. 23-24. doi: 10.1016/B978-008044529-8.50005-7.

[19] N. YILDIRIM OZCAN; modeling; simulation and optimization of flashed-steam geothermal power plants from the point of view of non-condensable gas removal systems; PhD thesis; Graduate School of Engineering and Science of Izmir Institute of Technology; 2010; pp. 82-83 & 149-150.

Citeringar i Crossref