Konferensartikel

Stina Alriksson
Linnaeus University, School of natural science, Kalmar, Sweden

Carl-Erik Grip
LTU (luleå University of technology) Dept Energy technology, Luleå, Sweden

Ladda ner artikelhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110571732

Ingår i: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:33, s. 1732-1739

Publicerad: 2011-11-03

ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

However; changes in an industrial complex do not only influence the technical values of energy and material efficiency. The social impact is also important and sometimes is comparable to that of technical factors.

A process integration project has recently been carried out for a paper mill in northern Sweden with a side view on future expansion with a bio refinery. An activity to study the social impacts were included through a Conjoint analysis; a stated preference method that combines statistics and interviewing technique.

The results indicate that the participants are divided in four groups; the largest group focusing on a change in the process towards a bio refinery; the second largest focusing on the local environment. The third and fourth group both look at the local forestry; one group wanting to increase local forest production; and one rejecting an increase.

[1] Home page of the Swedish forest industry; http://www.skogsindustrierna.org/ 2010-12-15 [2] Products from the forest – a natural choice- The Swedish Forest Industry’s sustainability publication 2008–2009. http://www.forestindustries.se/web/Publications_and_surveys.aspx 2010-12-15 [3] Lundgren J. et. al. Development of a regional-economic process integration model for Billerud Karlsborg AB. 2010 [4] Ji X.; Lundgren J.; Wang C.; Dahl J.; Grip C-E. Process simulation and energy optimization of a paper and pulp mill. Presented at PRES; Prague; August 28 – September 1; 2010. [5] Grip C-E; Lundmark R; Alriksson S. Possibilities for combined evaluation of social; economic energy/environmental values. Presented at the International Seminar on Society & Materials; SAM3; Freiberg 2009 [6] Itsubo; N.; M. Sakagami; T. Washida; K. Kokubu and A. Inaba; Weighting across safeguard subjects for LCIA through the application of conjoint analysis; International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9; 2004; pp196-205. doi: 10.1007/BF02994194. [7] Sammons NE; Yuan W; Eden MR; Aksoy B; Cullinan HT; Optimal biorefinery product allocation by combining process and economic modeling; chemical engineering research and design 86; 2008; pp 800–808 [8] Green; P. E. and V. Srinivasan; Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice; Journal of Marketing 54; 1990; pp 3-20. doi: 10.2307/1251756. [9] McCullough; D; A user’s guide to conjoint analysis; Marketing Research 14;2002; pp 18-23. [10] Gustafsson; A.; A. Herrmann and F. Huber; Conjoint measurement – methods and applications; Springer Verlag; 2003; Berlin. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24713-5. [11] Alriksson; S. and T. Öberg; Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation – a review of methods and applications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 15; 2008; pp 237-250. doi: 10.1065/espr2008.02.479. [12] Martens; H. and M. Martens; Multivariate analysis of quality - an introduction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Chichester; England; 2001. [13] CAMO; The Unscrambler v9.2; 2005; Oslo; Norway; CAMO Process AS. [14] Bigsby; H. and L. K. Ozanne; The purchase decision: consumers and environmentally certified wood products. Forest Products Journal 52; 2002; pp 100-105. [15] Narin; A.; L. Ede and P. Naudé; Multivariate statistics in industrial marketing management: A practitioner tool kit; Industrial Marketing Management 33; 2004; pp 573-582. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.12.004. [16] SPSS_Inc.; SPSS 17.0.0.; 2008.