Konferensartikel

Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Service Design: Insights from British service designers

Qin Han
School of Design, DOJ, University of Dundee, UK

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: Conference Proceedings ServDes.2009; DeThinking Service; ReThinking Design; Oslo Norway 24-26 November 2009

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 59:8, s. 93-104

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2012-09-19

ISBN: 978-91-7519-771-5

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

The global shift towards a service-based economy has led many organisations to rethink their operations and strategies from a service-centred point of view; which is intangible; customeroriented and relational (Vargo and Lusch; 2008). Professionals and scholars from different disciplines have subsequently pioneered practices and research in the field of service. As a response; Service Design; with its creative- and people-centred nature emerged as a distinct discipline.

Designing a service system requires input from all stakeholders; which include internal stakeholders from the different organisational functions; as well as external stakeholders such as user groups and supply teams. When design specialists are involved; they are expected to bring skills and approaches that not only balance complex stakeholders’ requirements but also create embodied solutions to meet these needs. Consequently; to achieve the best solution; acknowledgment and input from multiple stakeholders are essential to designer’s decision-making.

This paper reports emerging insights from some British Service Design practitioners who were interviewed as part of the empirical studies of an ongoing PhD research project. The project initially asked; ’How do designers; as external consultants; manage multiple stakeholder involvement in Service Design projects?’

In this paper; the theoretical and empirical contexts are briefly reviewed; which lead to three specific research questions. A three-stage qualitative research approach is then introduced of which two have so far been carried out. Two case studies are introduced; which lead to two emerging categories of designers’ approaches to multiple stakeholder management; namely leading and facilitating. In order to develop these emerging categories; further study is required; which forms the final stage of this research project and which is detailed at the end of this paper.

Nyckelord

Inga nyckelord är tillgängliga

Referenser

Andriof; J. and Waddock; S. (2002) Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement. IN Andriof; J.; Waddock; S.; Husted; B. & Rahman; S. S. (Eds.) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory; Responsibility and Engagement. Sheffield; Greenleaf.

Buchanan; R. (2007) Richard Buchanan Keynote - Emergence Conference 2007.

Charmaz; K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis; London; Sage.

Cleland; D. I. (1998) Stakeholder Managment. IN Pinto; J. K. (Ed.) Project Management Handbook. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Corbin; J. and Strauss; A. (1990) Grounded Theory Research: Procedures; Canons; and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology; 13; 3.

Elias; A. A.; Cavana; R. Y. and Jackson; L. S. (2002) Stakeholder Analysis for R&D Project Management. R&D Management; 32; 301-310.

Fisk; R. P. and Grove; S. J. (2009) The Evolution and Future of Service: Building and Broadening a Multidisciplinary Field. IN Spohrer; J. C.; Maglio; P. P. & Kieliszewksi; C. A. (Eds.) Service Science Handbook. New York; Springer.

Flick; U. (1997) The Episodic Interview: Small Scale Narratives as Approach to Relevant Experiences; accessed 20 October 2009 <http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodologyInstitute/pdf/QualPapers/Flickepisodic. pdf>.

Flick; U. (2009) An Introduction to Qualitative Research; London; Sage.

Freeman; E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach; Marshfield; MA; Pitman.

Glaser; B. G. (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity; Mill Valley; CA; The Sociology Press.

Han; Q. (2009) Mind the Gap: Theories and Practices in Managing Stakeholders in the Service Design Process; Re-public; accessed 22 August 2009 <http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=1304 >.

Hollins; G. and Hollins; B. (1991) Total Design Managing the Design Process in the Service Sector; Pitman.

Jergeas; G. F.; Williamson; E.; Skulmoski; G. J. and Thomas; J. (2000) Stakeholder Management on Construction Projects. AACE International Transaction. 103

Karlsen; J. T. (2002) Project Stakeholder Management. Engineering Management Journal; 14; 19- 24.

Normann; R. (1984) Service Management; New York; NY; Wiley.

Reason; B. (2009) Interview (Personal Communication).

Shostack; G. L. (1977) Breaking Free from Product Marketing. Journal of Marketing.

Shostack; G. L. (1984) Designing Service That Deliver. Harvard Business Review; Jan-Feb.

Vargo; S. L. and Lusch; R. F. (2008) Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science; 1-10.

Yin; R. K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods; London; Sage.

Yin; R. K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods; Sage Publications.

Zeithaml; V. A. and Bitner; M. J. (1996) Services Marketing; McGraw-Hill.

Citeringar i Crossref