Sebastian Meinke
University of Rostock, Chair of Thechnical Thermodynamics, Germany
Freidrich Gottelt
XRG Simulation, Germany
Martin Müller
University of Rostock, Chair of Thechnical Thermodynamics, Germany
Egon Hassel
University of Rostock, Chair of Thechnical Thermodynamics, Germany
Ladda ner artikel
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp11063353Ingår i: Proceedings of the 8th International Modelica Conference; March 20th-22nd; Technical Univeristy; Dresden; Germany
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 63:39, s. 353-364
Publicerad: 2011-06-30
ISBN: 978-91-7393-096-3
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
Governmental encouragement of renewable energies like wind energy led to an extensive increase of installed wind energy capacity worldwide. In order to allow a complete integration of this continuously fluctuating energy source; it is necessary to have a highly flexible operation management as well as power stations which are able to follow the high dynamics of the wind power production.
In this context the component fatigue and operational limitations of current and future power stations have to be investigated under the influence of enhanced plant dynamics.
For this purpose a detailed Modelica model of the hard coal fired steam power plant of Rostock; Germany is presented and extensively validated. The model makes use of the well-known non-commercial library ThermoPower. This Modelica Library is extended by models for common solid fuel burners and radiation-dominated firing zones. In addition to this; different approaches for modeling two-phase containers like the feed water tank are discussed. The derived model is used to compare different operation modes with respect to the occurring component wear.
ThermoPower; coal fired power plants; firing modeling; two phase tank; power unit start up
[1] Dahl-Soerensen; M.J./ Solberg; B. Pulverized Fuel Control using Biased Flow Measurements. In: IFAC Symposium on Power Plants and Power Systems Control; Tampere; 2009.
[2] Hojczyk;B./ Hühne;W./ Thierfelder;H.G. Das Steinkohlekraftwerk Rostock. In: VGB Kraftwerkstechnik 77; 1997.
[3] Casella;C./ Leva;A. Open Library for Power Plant Simulation: Design and Experimental Validation. In: proceedings of 3rd. International Modelica Conference; Linköping; 2003.
[4] Niemczyk;P./ Andersen;P./ Bendtsen;J.D. /Soendergaard Pedersen;T. /Ravn;A.P. Derivation and validation of a coal mill model for control. In: IFAC Symposium on Power Plants and Power Systems Control; Tampere; 2009.
[5] Effenberger Dampferzeugung. Berlin; Springer-Verlag; 2000.
[6] Verein Deutscher Ingenieure VDI-Wärmeatlas; 10. Auflage. Berlin; Springer-Verlag; 2006.
[7] VDI/VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik VDI/VDE - Richtlinie 3508: Block-Führung/-Regelung von Wärmekraftwerken; 2002.
[8] Deutscher Dampfkesselausschuss Technische Regeln für Dampfkessel (TRD) 301 Berechnung auf Wechselbeanpruchung durch schwellenden Innendruck bzw. durch kombinierte Innendruck- und Temperaturänderungen. Carl Heymanns Verlag KG; 2000.
[9] Deutscher Dampfkesselausschuss Technische Regeln für Dampfkessel (TRD) 508 Zusätzliche Prüfungen an Bauteilen berechnet mit zeitabhängigen Festigkeitswerten. Carl Heymanns Verlag KG; 2000.
