Agneta Ranerup
Department of Applied IT, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Inger Hallberg
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Centre for Person-Centred Care, Sahlgrenska Academy/The University of Gothenburg Learning and Media Technology Study, University of Göteborg, Sweden
Ulrika Bengtsson
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Centre for Person-Centred Care, Sahlgrenska Academy/The University of Gothenburg Learning and Media Technology Study, University of Göteborg, Sweden
Karin Kjellgren
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping ,University
Ladda ner artikel
Ingår i: Persuasive Technology: Design for Health and Safety; The 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology; PERSUASIVE 2012; Linköping; Sweden; June 6-8; Adjunct Proceedings
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 68:14, s. 53-56
Publicerad: 2012-06-06
ISBN:
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
The overall aim of this research program is to design and examine if a mobile phone-based self-report system can be used to a) mediate knowledge about hypertension b) improve adherence to antihypertensive treatment and c) increase patient participation and autonomy.
1. Haynes; R.; Yao; X. et al.: Interventions to enhance medication adherence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4; CD000011 (2005)
2. Bokhour; B. G.; Berlowitz; D. R. et al.: How do providers assess antihypertensive medication adherence in medical encounters? Journal of General Internal Medicine 21; 577-583 (2006)
3. Scientific Advisory Committee of Medical Outcomes Trust: Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research 11; 193- 205 (2002)
4. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); et al.: Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Draft Guidance; U.S (2006)
5. Blake; H.: Mobile phone technology in chronic disease management. Nursing Standard 23(12); 43-46 (2008)
6. Leplege; A.; Gzil; F.; Cammelli; M.; Lefeve; C.; Pachoud; B.; Ville; I.: Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disability Rehabilitation Oct 30-Nov 15; 29(20- 21); 1555-1556 (2007)
7. Quill; T. E.; Brody H.: Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Annals of Internal Medicine Nov 1; 125(9); 763-769 (1996)
8. Chatterjee; S.; Price; A.: Healthy living with persuasive technologies: Framework; issues; challenges. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 16 (2); 171-178 (2009)
9. Kjellgren; K.I.; Ahlner; J.; Dahlof; B.; Gill; H.; Hedner; T.; Saljo; R. Perceived symptoms amongst hypertensive patients in routine clinical practice- a population-based study. Journal of General Internal Medicine 244; 325-332 (1998)
10. Lehoux; P.; Hivon; M.; William-Jones; B.; Urbach; D.: The worlds and modalities of engagement of design participants: A qualitative case study of three medical innovations. Design Studies 32; 313-332 doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.1.001 (2011)
11. Maitland; J.: Towards negotiation as a framework for health promoting technologies. SIGHIT Record 1 (19); 10-19 (2011)
