Louise Milne
Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, New Zealand
Michael Forret
Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, New Zealand
Ladda ner artikel
Ingår i: PATT 26 Conference; Technology Education in the 21st Century; Stockholm; Sweden; 26-30 June; 2012
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 73:41, s. 348-354
Publicerad: 2012-06-18
ISBN: 978-91-7519-849-1
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
Technology Education is one of eight learning areas of the New Zealand national curriculum. It aims to develop a broad technological literacy through students participating in learning programmes in which they engage in technological practice and through this practice develop capability; knowledge and an understanding of technology as a domain in its own right. Experiencing and exploring contemporary examples of technological practice is recognised as an effective way of developing technological literacy and; in this study; students visited a chocolate factory in order to find out how to make a chocolate gift for Mothers’ Day. While the value of learning experiences outside the classroom (LEOTC) is well documented in learning areas such as science; there are few studies which explore LEOTC in Technology and specifically those of junior primary students.
A key element of this process; and the focus of this paper; is the role that parent helpers play in guiding and supporting students during both visits outside the classroom; and construction tasks within the classroom. It also raises the issue of the preparation and scaffolding parents require to enable them to help students effectively carry out these tasks. The role of a parent helper is a crucial one and the data from this study suggests that the status and time given to this preparation is; at times; varied and can have significant impact on children’s learning outcomes.
Anderson; D. (2003) ‘Visitors long-term memories of world expositions’. Curator; 46; 4; 401-420.
Anderson; D.; Thomas; G.; and Ellenbogen; K. (2003) ‘Learning science from experiences in informal contexts: The next generation of research’. Asia-Pacific forum on science learning and teaching; 4;1; Forward.
Bailey; R.; Armour; K.; Kirk; D.; Jess; M.; Pickup; I.; and Sandford; R. (2009) ‘The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review’. Research Papers in Education; 24; 1; 1-27.
Bolstad; R.D. (2000) ‘The actual and potential role of science and technology centres in New Zealand primary science and technology education’. In Campbell J. Mc Robbie (ed); Australasian Science Education Research Association 2000; Sydney.
Cox-Peterson; A.M.; Marsh; D.D.; Kisiel; J.; and Melber; L.M. (2003) ‘Investigation of guided school tours; student learning; and science reform: Recommendations at a Museum of Natural History’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching; 40; 2; 200-218.
Dierking; L.D.; Falk; J.H.; Rennie; L.; Anderson; D.; and Ellenbogen; K. (2003) ‘Policy statement of the Informal Science Education ad hoc committee’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching; 40; 2; 108-111.
Jarvis; T.; and Pell; A. (2002) ‘Effect of the challenger experience on elementary children’s attitudes to science’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching; 39; 10; 979-1000.
Lambert; D.; and Balderstone; D. (2000). Learning to teach geography in the secondary school; Routledge/Falmer; London.
Ministry of Education (2007); Technology curriculum support. Retrieved from http://www. techlink.org.nz/curriculum-support.
Ministry of Education (2010); Learning experiences outside the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/NZEducation/EducationPolicies/Schools/ CurriculumAndNCEA/NationalCurriculum/LearningExperiencesOutsideTheClassroom.
Ministry of Education. (2011). Education outside the classroom. Te Kete ipurangi. Retrieved from http://eotc.tki.org.nz/LEOTC-home
Rennie; L.J. and McClafferty; T.P. (1996) ‘Science centres and science learni’. Studies in Science Education; 27; 53-98.
Sandifer; C. (2003) ‘Technological novelty and open-endedness: Characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching; 40; 2; 121-137.
Tofield; S.; Coll; R.K.; Vyle; B.; and Bolstad; R. (2003). ‘Zoos as a source of free choice learning’. Research in Science and Technology Education; 21; 1; 74-99.
Vygotsky; L.S. (1978); Mind in Society; Harvard University Press; Cambridge; MA.
Wineman; J.; Piper; C.; and Maple; T.L. (1996) ‘Zoos in transition: Enriching conservation education for a new generation’; Curator; 39; 2; 94-107.
