Perceptions of STEM; within the context of teaching DandT in secondary schools: A phenomenographically inspired study

Dawne Bell
Edge Hill University, UK

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: PATT 26 Conference; Technology Education in the 21st Century; Stockholm; Sweden; 26-30 June; 2012

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 73:8, s. 74-80

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2012-06-18

ISBN: 978-91-7519-849-1

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)


Inget abstract är tillgängligt


Inga nyckelord är tillgängliga


Åkerlind; G.S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods; Higher Education Research and Development; Vol. 24; pp. 321-334.

Ashworth; P. and Lucas; U. (2000). Achieving empathy and engagement; A practical approach to the + design; conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research; Studies in Higher Education; Taylor Francis; Vol 25:3; 295-308.

Barlex; D. (2008). STEM - can we still be cheerful? DATA news February 2008; DATA:Wellesbourne.

Barlex; D. (2009). The STEM Programme in England – help or hindrance for design & technology education? PATT22 Conference; Delft; Netherlands; Available at: http://www. iteaconnect.org/Conference/PATT/PATT22/Barlex.pdf

BERA (2011). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research; Available at: http://www.bera. ac.uk/publications/ethical-guidelines

Bowden; J. and Green; P. (eds) (2005). Doing Developmental Phenomenography; RMIT University Press; Melbourne.

Walsh. E. (1994). Phenomenographic analysis of interview transcripts; In Bowden; J. and Walsh; E. (eds) Phenomenographic research; variations in method (p17-30) The Warburton Symposium; Melbourne; The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.

DFE (Department for Education) (2010). The Importance of Teaching; Available from: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationdetail/page1/CM%20 7980

DFE (Department for Education) (2011). Training our next Generation of Outstanding Teachers; Available from: http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/careers/ traininganddevelopment/a0078019/training-outstanding-teachers.

DFE (Department for Education) (2011). The STEM cohesion programme: Final report; Available at: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DFE-RR147. pdf

DES (Department for Education and Skills) (1988). Terms of reference of the Design and Technology Working Group National.

Fazey; J.A. and Marton; F. (2002). Understanding the Space of Experiential Variation; Active Learning in Higher Education 3; 234; Available from: http://alh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/ abstract/3/3/234;

Hardy; G. Howes; A. Spendlove; D. and Wake; G. (2008). Opportunities to confront and cross subject boundaries: Trainee teachers’ perceptions of the differences and interrelationships between STEM subjects; Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference; Heriot-Watt University; Edinburgh.

Kvale; S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to Qualitative research Interviewing; Sage Publications;Thousand Oaks; California.

Lewis; T. Barlex; D. Chapman C. and Christer; K. (2007). Investigating interaction between science and D&T (D&T) in the secondary school – a case study approach; Research in Science and Technology Education; 25; 1; 37-58 Routledge; UK.

Mannion; K. and Coldwell; M. (2008). After-school Science and Engineering Clubs Evaluation: Final Report; Available from: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/ standard/publicationdetail/page1/DCSF-RW071

Marton; F. (1994). Phenomenography; in T.Husen and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds) International Encyclopaedia of Education; Vol. 8; second edition: 4424-29; Oxford: Pergamon

Marton; F. (2000). The structure of awareness; in J. Bowden and E. Walsh (eds); Phenomenography; Melbourne: RMIT University Press

Marton; F. and Booth; S. (1997). Learning and Awareness Mahwah; New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pitt; J. (2009). Blurring the Boundaries – STEM education and Education for Sustainable Development; D&T Education; an International Journal; Vol 14; No 1.

Prosser; M. (1993). Phenomenography and the Principles and Practice of Learning; Higher Education Research and Development; Vol. 12(1):21-31.

Roberts; G. (2002). SET for success: The supply of people with science; technology; engineering and mathematics skills; Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO); London; Available from: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ent_res_roberts.htm

Sainsbury; D. (2007). The Race to the Top: A Review of Government’s Science and Innovation Policies; Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO); London; Available from: http://www.hmtreasury. gov.uk/sainsbury_index.htm

Sandburg; J. (1997). Are Phenomenographic results reliable?; Higher Education and Research Development; Vol16:2; 203-212.

Svensson; L. and Theman; (1983). The relation between categories of description and an interview protocol in a case of phenomenographic research; paper presented at: Second annual human science research conference.

Webb; G. (1997). Reconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of Phenomenography; Higher education Vol 3 (2):195-212.

Wellington; J. (2000). Education research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London; UK: Continuum.

Williams; J. (2011). STEM Education: Proceed with caution; D&T Education; an International Journal; Vol 16; No 1.

Citeringar i Crossref