Konferensartikel

Evidence for Excellence in Internationalization and Mobility: A Self Assesment

Tommy Josefsson
Shool of Engineering, Jönköping Univeristy, Jönköping

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: 3:e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar; 30 november - 1 december; Campus Norrköping; Linköpings universitet

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 75:22, s. 109-117

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2012-06-26

ISBN:

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

Internationalization and Mobility (I&M) has become an integrated part of engineering education; making institutions embracing it as a worthy profile in their marketing strategies. Though most areas of operation at an engineering institution are annually evaluated through systematic quality assessments; their I&M profile seldom is put under scrutiny. One reason might be that the standard for I&M insufficiently is stated through assessable outcomes and evidence.

The issue of I&M has been propelled onto the agenda of the CDIO initiative as a suggested 13thCDIO standard. Furthermore; the Swedish board of Higher Education (HSV) has highlighted the need for regular quality assessments that goes beyond the survey tools of STARS and ISB. The Dutch organisation for international cooperation (NUFFIC) has taken it a step further and produced an elaborate matrix as a help in the assessment. In an effort to support the process; this paper will present a self-assessment of I&M at the School of Engineering; Jönköping University with the ambition to formulate clearer outcomes and evidence for excellence in Internationalization and Mobility. The central question will be: What are the evidence for a good standard of internationalization at the university? Information has been gathered from all stakeholders; students; personnel and board members. Research has also been done on what is written in the area of assessing Internationalization & Mobility.

Clearly formulated evidence for excellence in I&M and a model of how to constructively do quality assurance should contribute to the current discussion on Internationalization within the engineering education in Sweden.

Nyckelord

Internationalization; mobility; self-assessment; quality assurance; evidence for excellence

Referenser

Bengtsson; Anna Ryan. (2008) ? Att värdera Internationell Erfarenhet – Varför är det så svårt?? Rapportserie 21. Stockholm: Internationella Programkontoret.

Bulgarelli Aviana (2009) ?European guidelines for validating non-formal and informal learning?. Luxenbourg: Cedefop /EU. http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/4054_en.pdf

Campbell; Duncan. (2010) ?Proposed CDIO Standard 13 - Internationalisation and Mobility?. Montreal: CDIO 6th Annual conference.

Enequist; Gunnar. (2008) En Högskola i världen – internationalisering för kvalité. Stockholm: HSV Rapport 2008:15:R

Franke Sigbrit (2005) ?En gränslös högskola? Om internationalisering av grund- och forskarutbildning.? Högskoleverkets rapportserie 2005:1 R Stockholm: Högskoleverket

Gaalen; Adinda van. (2010) ?Quality Assurance and Internationalization.? www.nuffic.nl

Reeb-Gruber Sandra. (2009). ?Checklists Program Internationalization? http://www.nuffic.nl/international-organizations/services/quality-assurance-and-internationalization Haarlem: INHolland University.

Ninnes; Peter. Hellstén Meeri. Eds. (2005). Internationalizing Higher Education – Critical Explorations of Pedagogy and Policy. CERC Studies in Comparative Education 16. Dordrecht: Springer

Hellstén Meeri. Reid; Anna Eds. (2008). Researching International Pedagogies – Sustainable Practice for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. New York: Springer

Citeringar i Crossref