Li-Hsing Shih
Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan
Tse-Yuen Chou
Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan
Ladda ner artikel
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conference 2010; 14-15 April; Linköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 77:22, s. 173-178
Publicerad: 2012-10-11
ISBN: 978-91-7393-381-0
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
Conjoint analysis has been widely used to find consumers’ preference and direction of improvement in new product development. It can also be used in product service system development and marketing as long as attributes and attribute levels are carefully selected. This study focuses on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay (WTP) of product service system taking photovoltaic system as an example. Leasing is considered as a type of product service that consumers could choose. In addition; consumers’ concerns on several uncertainties are measured in order to find the effect of uncertainty on preference of different lease times. The results show that the concern of uncertainties on government subsidy; electricity price; reliability; and rise of new generation solar power system would significantly affect the additional willingness-to-pay for shorter lease time. The relation between gap of WTP between lease times and uncertainty scores that measure consumers’ concern are presented. Cluster analysis is used to find two groups with high and low concern of uncertainty. People with higher concern on uncertainty tend to pay more for adopting PSS with shorter lease time.
[1] European Photovoltaic Industry Association; 2009; “Global market outlook for photovoltaics until 2013; EPIA report.
[2] Bagnall; D.M. and Boreland; M.; 2008; ”Photovoltaic technologies;” Energy Policy 36; 4390-4396.
[3] Hoffmann; W.; S. M. Pietruszko; M. Viaud; 2004; ”Towards an Effective European Industrial Policy for PV Solar Electricity”; 19th PVSEC Paris; June.
[4] Krieger; A. M.; P. E. Green; Y. J. Wind; 2004; Adventures in Conjoint Analysis: A Practitioner’s Guide to Trade-Off Modeling and Applications; Monograph; University of Pennsylvania.
[5] Green; P. E. and V. Srinivasan; 1990; Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice; Journal of Marketing; 54; 4; 3-19.
[6] Danielis; R.; E. Marcucci and L. Rotaris; 2005; Logistics Managers Stated Preferences for Freight Service Attributes; Transportation Research Part; E41; 201-215.
[7] Lockshin; L.; W. Jarvis; F. Hauteville; and J. Perrouty; 2006; Using Simulations from Discrete Choice Experiments to Measure Consumer
Sensitivity to Brand; Region; Price; and Awards in Wine Choice; Journal of Food Quality and Preference; 17;166-178.
[8] Enneking; U.; C. Neumann; and S. Henneberg; 2007; “How Important Intrinsic and Extrinsic Product Attributes Affect Purchase Decision;” Journal of Food Quality and Preference; 18;133-138.
[9] Green; P.E. and Y. Wind; 1975; “New Ways to Measure Consumer Judgments;” Harvard Business Reviews; 53;107-117.
[10] Hurlimann; A. and McKay J.; 2007; “Urban Australians Using Recycled Water for Domestic Non- Potable Use-An Evaluation of the Attributes Price; Saltiness; Color and Odor Using Conjoint Analysis; “Environmental Management; 85; 1; 93-104
[11] Espino; R.; Martin; J. C. and Roman; C.; 2008; “Analyzing the Effect of Preference Heterogeneity on Willingness to Pay for Improving Service Quality in an Airline Choice Context;” Transportation Research part E; 44; 4; 593-606.
[12] Longo; A.; Markandya A. and Petrucci M.; 2008; “The Internalization of Externalities in the Production of Electricity: Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of a Policy for Renewable Energy;” Ecological Economics; 67; 1; 140-152.
[13] Ram; S. and Sheth; J.; 1989; “Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and Its Solutions;” Journal of Consumer Marketing; 6; 2; 313-326.
[14] Cox; D. N.; Evans; G. and Lease; H. J.; 2007; “The Influence of Information and Beliefs about Technology on the Acceptance of Novel Food Technologies: A Conjoint Study of Farmed Prawn Concepts;” Food Quality and Preference; 18; 5;813– 823.
[15] Goett; A.; Hudson; K. and Train; K.; 2000; “Customers’ Choice among Retail Energy Suppliers: The Willingness-to-Pay for Service Attribute;” AAG Associates; and Department of Economics University of California; Berkeley.
