Konferensartikel

Design Legacies: Why Service Designers are not able to Embed Design in the Organisation

Sabine Junginger
Kolding School of Design, Denmark

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: ServDes.2014 Service Future; Proceedings of the fourth Service Design and Service Innovation Conference; Lancaster University; United Kingdom; 9-11 April 2014

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 99:16, s. 164-172

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2014-06-25

ISBN: 978-91-7519-280-2

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

Much talk about service design has focused on how to bring design practices; design thinking and design methods into an organization in order to transform or change the way it is going about business. There is only one thing that researchers and practitioners have overlooked: Design principles; methods and practices are already deeply embedded in organizations. That is; in fact; the real problem: Organizations are full of design legacies; however flawed and poorly suited. If service designers want to effect real change in real organizations; they have to be able to articulate these organizational design practices. This paper explains the concept of design legacies and describes three elements of organizational design legacies: organizational purpose; organizational design approaches and organizational design practices. Using a matrix developed around designing for; with and by; the paper explains how we can make sense of existing organizational design practices.

Nyckelord

organizational design practices; design legacies; public organizations; service design; organizational change

Referenser

Arnstein; S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation; Journal of the American Institute of Planners; 35(4); 216-234.

Buchanan; R. (2004). Interaction Pathways into Organizational Life. In Boland R. & Collopy; F. (Eds). Managing as Designing. Stanford University Press; CA.

Bitner; M. J.; Booms; B. H.; Tetreault Stanfiedl; M. (1990). The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable. The Journal of Marketing; 54(1); 71-84.

Eiglier; P. & Langeard; E. (1987). Servuction; le Marketing de Services. Paris; France: McGraw Hill.

Fulton; S. (2007). Keynote; PDF made available to author with link to original conference: http://designingwithpeople.rca.ac.uk/home/about.

Gorb; P. & Dumas; A. (1987). Silent Design. Design Studies; 8(3); 150-156.

Gummesson; E. (1990). Service design. Total Quality Management; April; 97-101.

Junginger; S. (forthcoming). Transformation by Design. London; UK: Gower.

Junginger; S. (forthcoming). Towards Policy-Making as Designing. In Bason; C. (Ed.) Design for Policy. London; UK: Gower Ashgate.

Junginger; S. & Sangiorgi; D. (2009). Service Design and Organizational Change: Bridging the Gap Between Rigor and Relevance. Proceedings from the 3rd IASDR09 Conference; Seoul.

Junginger; S. & Sangiorgi; D. (2011). Public Policy and Public Management: Contextualizing Service Design in the Public Sector. In Cooper; R.; Junginger; S. & Lockwood; T. (Eds.)

The Handbook of Design Management (pp. 480-494). Oxford; UK: Berg.

Leadbeater; C. (2009). An Original Essay for Cornerhouse; Manchester Draft March 2009; Retrieved from http://charlesleadbeater.net/.

Meroni & Sangiorgi (Eds.) (2011). Design for Services. London; UK: Gower.

Sangiorgi; D. (2011). Transformative Services and Transformation Design; International Journal of Design. 5(2); 29-40.

Senatsverwaltung für Stadt und Umwelt Berlin (2011). Handbuch zur Partizipation; second edition 2012. Retrieved from http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/soziale_stadt/partizipation/download/Handbuch_Partizipation.pdf

Shostack; G.L. (1984). Designing services that deliver. Harvard Business Review; 62(1); 133-139.

Shostack; G.L. (1985). Planning the service encounter. In John A.; Czepiel; et al. (Eds.) The Service Encounter (pp. 243-254). Lexington; MA: Lexington Books.

Citeringar i Crossref