Mirja Kälviäinen
North-Karelia University of Applied Sciences, D’ART Design Resource Centre, Finland
Ladda ner artikel
Ingår i: 10th QMOD Conference. Quality Management and Organiqatinal Development. Our Dreams of Excellence; 18-20 June; 2007 in Helsingborg; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 26:114, s.
Publicerad: 2008-02-15
ISBN:
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
The goal for this paper is to analyse the application of make do methods for capturing tangible user experience during intensive innovation sessions. The use of make do methods in design practice supports applying them to the participatory innovation sessions. The research and methods in visual psychology and sociology can inform stimulus and tasks for the make do methods. As practical applications two company cases from lock and building industries are described.
Belk; R. W.; (1998); “Multimedia approaches to qualitative data”; Stern;B.B.; Representing consumers. Voices; views and visions; Routledge; London; New York
Bloch; P. H; (1995); “Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response”; Journal of Marketing; Vol. 59; July 1995; 16 - 29.
Crilley; N.; Moultrie; J.; Clarkson; P. J.; (2004); “Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design”; Design Studies; 25; 547-577
Crozier; R.; (1994); Manufactured pleasures: psychological responses to design; Manchester; University Press Manchester
Ewen; S. (1990); “Marketing dreams. The political elements of style”; Tomlison; A.; Consumption; identity; and style: marketing; meanings; and the packaging of pleasure; Routledge; New York
Jordan; P.; (2002); Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors; Taylor & Francis; London
Kelley; T.; – Littman; J.; (2003); The Art of Innovation. Lessons in Creativity from IDEO; IDEO; San Francisco
Kälviäinen; M.; (2002); “Product design for consumer taste”; Green; W.; Jordan; P.; Pleasure with Products. Beyond Usability; Taylor & Francis; London
Kälviäinen; M.; Miller; H.; (2005); “Visual research: means of producing shared meanings” Proceedings of Joining Forces International Conference on Design Research; September 22-24; 2005; UIAH; Helsinki
Lupien; J.; (1995); “Polysensoriality in Plastic Symbolic Discourses”; Sebeok; T.; Umiker-Sebeok; J.; Advances in Visual semiotics. The Semiotic Web 1992-93; Mouton de Gruyter; Berlin; New York
Norman; D. A.; (2004); Emotional Design; Basic Books; New York
Roth; I - Bruce; V.; (1995); Perception and representation: current issues; Open University Press; Buckingham
Storkerson; P.; (2003); Designing Theory in Communication; Visible Language; Rhode Island School of Design; Providence
Zaltman; G. (1997); “Rethinking Ma
