Konferensartikel

Contemporary Kurdish Families in Finland: Traditional; Modern or Something Else?

Anne Häkkinen
University of Jyväskylä, Finland

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: Current Issues in European Cultural Studies; June 15-17; Norrköping; Sweden 2011

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 62:8, s. 55-62

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2011-11-22

ISBN: 978-91-7519-993-1

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

Family is a central institute that regulates person´s life in Kurdish communities and thus family relations are highly valued. Marriage – as closely related to family – is one of the key factors that maintains desired family relations. However Kurdish family patterns are usually seen and considered to be in terms of traditional for the reason that family have a great power over the individual. Still it is assumed that parents have to give their approval for the marriage. One way of sustaining family ties and family dynamics typical for Kurdish communities in the context of migration is marriage patterns. Example of this is the phenomenon called transnational marriage: an immigrant search for his/her spouse from country of origin and brings her/him back to the country of settlement. However this is not the only way of getting married among Kurds in Finland.

In my presentation I will discuss about the concepts of modern and traditional in the context of migration. Is it reasonable to use these concepts when trying to understand Kurdish families and marriage practices? Are we entitled to call them traditional or should we use other words to describe them?

Nyckelord

Inga nyckelord är tillgängliga

Referenser

Alinia; Minoo (2004). Spaces of Diasporas. Kurdish identities; experiences of otherness and politics of belonging. Göteborg Studies in Sociology No. 22. Doktorsavhandling. Göteborg: Sociologiska Institutionen; Göteborgs universitet.

Anttonen; Pertti (1993). Tradition and Its Study as Discursive Practice: Modern and Postmodern Perspectives on Folklore Research. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Folklore and Folklife; University of Pennsylvania.

Anttonen; Pertti J. (2005). Tradition through modernity. Postmodernism and the Nation-State in Folklore Scholarship. Studia Fennica Folkloristica 15. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.

Barth; Fredrik (1954). Father´s brother´s daughter marriage in Kurdistan. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology; vol. 10; No. 2; Summer 1954; 164–171.

Bastug; Sharon (2002). Household and family in Contemporary Turkey: a Historical Perspective. In Rita Liljeström & Elisabeth Özdalga (eds); Autonomy and Dependency in theFamily: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective. Transactions Vol. 11. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul; 99–115.

Beck; Ulrich & Giddens; Anthony & Lash; Scott (1994). Reflexive Modernisation. Politics; Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck-Gernsheim; Elisabeth (2007). Transnational Lives; Transnational Marriages: a Review of the Evidence from Migrant Communities in Europe. Global Networks 7; 3; 271–288.

Bruinessen; Martin van (1992). Kurdish society; ethnicity; nationalism and refugee problems. In Philip G. Kreyenbroek & Stefan Sperl (eds); The Kurds. Contemporary Overview. London: Routledge; 33–67.

Calinescu; Matei (1987). Five faces of modernity: modernism; avant-garde; decadence; kitsch; postmodernism. Durham: Duke University Press.

Ehn; Billy 1992. Kulturalisering på gott och ont. Kulturella perspektiv 1; 3–7.

Emanuelsson; Ann-Catrin (2007). ”Ska vi återvända; stanna eller pendla?” Politiska förändringar i Kurdistan och transnationell dynamik i kurdiska flyktingfamiljer i Sverige. In Marita Eastmond & Lisa Åkesson (eds); Globala familjer. Transnationell migration och släktskap. Stockholm: Gidlunds Förlag; 259–288.

Ertem; Meliksah & Kocturk; Tahire (2008). Opinions on early-age marriage and marriage customs among Kurdish-speaking women in Southeast Turkey. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. vol. 34; No.3; July 2008; 147–152.

Gilroy; Paul (1995). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. London: Verso.

Grib; Lena (2002). Mediernas syn på De Andra. En Medieanalytisk studie I samband med morded på Fadime. Arbetsrapport; September 2002:9. Karlstads universitet; institutionen för samhällsvetenskap; avdelningen för Geografi och Turism.

Hassanpour; Amir (2001). The (Re)production of Patriarchy in the Kurdish Language. In Shahrzad Mojab (ed.); Women of A Non-State Nation. The Kurds. Kurdish Studies Series No. 3. California: Mazda Publishers; 227–263.

Ingold; Tim (1996). Introduction. In Tim Ingold (ed.) 1996. Key Debates in Anthropology. London & New York: Routledge; 201–205.

Jackson; Peter; Crang; Philip & Dwyer; Claire (2004). Introduction: the Spaces of Transnationality. In P. Jackson; P. Crang & C. Dwyer (eds); Transnational Spaces. London & New York: Routledge. Transantionalism; Routledge research in transnationalism; 6.

Khayati; Khalid (2008). From Victim Diaspora to Transborder Citizenship? Diaspora Formation and Transnational Relations Among Kurds in France and Sweden. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 435. Linköping: Linköping University.

Knauft; Bruce M. (2002). “Critically Modern: An Introduction.” In Bruce M. Knauft; (ed.); Critically Modern: Alternatives; Alterities; Anthropologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1-54.

Lievens; John. (1999). Family-forming Migration from Turkey and Morocco to Belgium: the Demand for Marriage Partners from the Countries of Origin. International Migration Review 33; 717–744.

Martikainen; Tuomas & Tiilikainen Marja (2007). Maahanmuuttajanaiset. Käsitteet; tutkimus ja haasteet. In Tuomas Martikainen & Marja Tiilikainen (eds); Maahanmuuttajanaiset: Kotoutuminen; perhe ja työ. Helsinki: Väestöliitto; Väestöntutkimuslaitos; 15–37.

Martikainen; Tuomas & Haikkola; Lotta (2010). Sukupolvet maahanmuuttotutkimuksessa. In Tuomas Martikainen & Lotta Haikkola (eds); Maahanmuutto ja sukupolvet. Nuorisotutkimusverkoston julkaisuja 106. Helsinki: SKS; 9–43.

Mohanty; Chandra Talpade (1991). Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. In C.T Mohanty; A. Russo & L. Torres (eds); Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 333–358.

Reniers; Georges (2001). The Post-Migration Survival of Traditional Marriage Patterns: Consanguineous Marriages among Turks and Moroccan in Belgium. Journal of Comparative Family Studies; Winter 2001; Vol 32 (1); 21–45.

Shaw; Alison. (2001). Kinship; cultural preference and immigration: consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute; 7; 315– 334.

Schmidt; Garbi (2008). Transnational Families among Turks and Pakistanis in Denmark: Good Subjects; Good Citizens and Good Lives. Finnish Journal of Ethnicity and Migration Vol.3.; No. 3.; 13–19.

Stark; Laura (2006). Johdanto. Pitkospuita modernisaation suolle. In Hilkka Helsti; Laura Stark & Saara Tuomaala (eds); Modernisaatio ja kansan kokemus Suomessa 1860–1960. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.

Statistics Finland (2011). Population structure. http://pxweb2.stat.fi/database/StatFin/vrm/vaerak/vaerak_fi.asp

Vertovec; Steven (2009). Transnationalism. Lontoo: Routledge.

Wahlbeck; Östen 1999. Kurdish Diasporas: A Comparative Study of Kurdish Refugee Communities. London: Macmillan.

Welz; Gisela (2004). Transnational Cultures and Multiple Modernities: Anthropology´s Encounter with Globalization. ZAA Quaterly; Vol. 52 (4); 409–422.

Yalçin-Heckmann; L. (1991). Tribe and Kinship among the Kurds. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Ytrehus; Line Alice (2007). The Generalized Other: Cultural Relativism and Ethic in Research on Ethnic Minorities. In Bente Gulveig Alver; Tove Ingebjørg Fjell & Ørjar Øyen (eds); Research Ethics in Studies of Culture and Social Life. Folklore Fellows’ Communications 292. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica; 137–166.

Ågren; Marja (2006). “Är du finsk; eller -?” En etnologisk studie om att växa upp och leva med finsk bakgrund i Sverige. Göteborg: Arkipelag.

Özdalga; Elisabeth (2002). Contrasting Modernities. In Rita Liljeström & Elisabeth Özdalga (eds); Autonomy and Dependency in the Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective. Transactions Vol. 11. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul; 3–16.

Citeringar i Crossref