Konferensartikel

Corporate Social Responsibility for Charity or for Service Business?

Bo Enquist
Service Research Center, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

Bo Edvardsson
Service Research Center, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

Samuel Petros Sebathu
Service Research Center, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

Ladda ner artikelhttp://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=026;article=078

Ingår i: 10th QMOD Conference. Quality Management and Organiqatinal Development. Our Dreams of Excellence; 18-20 June; 2007 in Helsingborg; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 26:78, s.

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2008-02-15

ISBN:

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

CSR) and the service logic. To attract and retain customers; and thus make a profit; companies are continuously searching for innovative ways to create value and differentiate their market offerings (Shaw and Ivens; 2002). Gummesson (2006) is critical about the axiomatic pillars of marketing. He argues that these pillars are an exaggerated and simplistic reliance on a ‘free’ market economy; the marketing concept of customer needs and satisfaction seems to be the highway to profit; maximization of short term profit (shareholder value) is the only purpose of business; unlimited growth seems to be beneficial; corporate citizenship diluted to charity; and blindness to the effects of unethical and criminal action and black economies (ibid. p. 340). Gummesson (ibid.) looks for a broader view in marketing. Gene Laczniak argues for an expansion of the service-dominant logic for some societal and ethical dimensions (Laczniak; 2006). He has expanded four of Vargo & Lusch’s foundational premises (FPs) 3; 4; 6 and 8 from Vargo & Lusch (2004). This article will; in an explorative way; counter this critique by Gummesson (2006) and also expand the service-dominant logic for some societal and ethical dimensions (Laczniak; 2006) using CSR and show real business cases where CSR is an important part of value creation and value-in-use; from a stakeholder perspective (Enquist; et al; 2006). The focus is on CSR as part of the dominant-service logic (Lusch and Vargo; 2006); with the following two research questions in mind: Is CSR only for charity or can it be an active part of a service business? If it can be part of a service business; how will that look? This article is the first in service research to specifically focus on CSR.

Following this introduction; this paper presents two conceptual and theoretical analyses - (i) CSR and its relation to profit and charity (ii) CSR as part of a service business model. The paper then illustrates these concepts using a comparative study of four service firms; with particular emphasis on their different CSR activities and how these affect the mission of each company. All four of the service companies are global actors with strong Service Brands (Edvardsson; Enquist and Hay; 2006) and a leading position in using CSR as a driving force for doing business: IKEA; Starbucks; H&M and the Body Shop. The paper then draws together the conceptual analysis and the case studies in a discussion of how CSR can be a proactive driver in the service business. Because of the limit space for a QMOD paper the focus is on the conceptual and theoretical analysis part and the empirical part and discussion/conclusion has to be further developed.

Nyckelord

Inga nyckelord är tillgängliga

Referenser

Andriof; J.; S. Waddock; B. Husted and S. Sutherland Rahman (eds) (2002). Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking. Theory; Responsibility and Engagement. Greenleaf Publishing; Sheffield.

Berry; L. L. (1999) Discovering the Soul of Service The Free Press. New York; USA

Berry; L.L.; Shankar;V.; Turner Parish; J.; Cadwallader; S. and Dotzel; D. (2006) Creating New markets Through Service Innovation MIT Sloan Management Review Winter 2006.

Brugman Jeb and Prahalad C.K.; (2007); Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact; Harvard Business Review; 85 (2); 80-90.

Carroll; A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons; July-August; pp. 39- 48.

Cramer; J. (2006); Corporate Social Responsibility and Globalisation: an action plan for business; Green-Leaf Publishing; Sheffield; UK

Edvardsson; B.; and Enquist; B.; (2002); THE IKEA SAGA- How Service Culture Drives Service Strategy; The Service Industries Journal. Vol 22; No 4; pp 153-186.

Edvardsson; B.; Enquist; B. and Johnston; B. (2005) Co-creating Customer Value through Hyperreality in the Pre-purchase Service Experience. Journal of Service Research; 8; 2: 149-161.

Edvardsson; B.; Enquist; B. and Hay; M. (2006) Values Based Service Brands: narratives from IKEA; Managing Service Quality; Vol. 16; No. 3; 2006; pp. 230-246

Elkington; J. (2001) The Chrysalis Economy. How Citizen CEOs and Corporation can Fuse Values and Value Creation. Capstone; Oxford.

Enquist; B; Johnsson; M and Skålén; P. (2006) Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility - Incorporating a Stakeholder Perspective Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management vol. 3 no 3 pp. 188 – 207.

Enquist; B.; Edvardsson; B. and Petros Sebathu; S. (forthcoming) Values Based Service Quality for Sustainable Business Managing Service Quality

Freeman; R. E. (1994) The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 409-421.

Friedman; M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profit. New York Times Magazine; The New York Times Company; September 13.

Grant; C. (1991). Freidman Fallacies. Journal of Business Ethics. No 10; pp.907-914.

Grönroos; C.; 2000; Service Management and Marketing – A customer relationship management approach Wiley; 2nd edition; Chichester

Gummesson; Evert. (1999) Total Relationship Marketing Rethinking Marketing Management: From 4Ps to 30Rs Butterworth Heinemann; Oxford; UK

Gummesson; E. (2006) “Many-to-Many Marketing as Grand Theory: A Nordic School Contribution” in Lusch;

R. F and Vargo; S. L (ed) (2006) The service Dominant Logic of Marketing; M.E. Sharpe; Inc. New York; USA

Hatch; M. J and Schultz; M. (2001) Are the Strategic Stars Aligned for Your Corporate Brand?; Harvard Business Review; February; pp 128-134.

Ind; N. (2004) Living The Brand. How to transform every member of your organization into a brand champion. Kogan Page; Second edition; London

Johnston; R.; and Clark; G.; (2001) Service Operations Management; Prentice Hall. London.

Konzelmann Suzanne J.; Wilkinson Frank; Craypo Charles; and Rabih Aridi; (2005); The Export of National Varieties of Capitalism: The Cases of Wal-Mart and Ikea; Centre for Business Research; University of Cambridge Working Paper No. 314

Kotler; P. and Lee; N. (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility. Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Wiley; Hoboken; New Jersey

Kristensson Uggla; B. (2002); Slaget om verkligheten (The battle for reality); Brutus Östlings Förlag; Stockholm.

Laczniak; G. R. (2006) ”Some Societal and Ethical Dimensions of the Service-Dominant Logic Perspective of Marketing” in Lusch; R. F and Vargo; S. L (ed) (2006); The service Dominant Logic of Marketing; M.E. Sharpe; Inc. New York; USA

Lusch; R. F and Vargo; S. L (2006); The service Dominant Logic of Marketing; M.E. Sharpe; Inc. New York; USA

Palmisano Samuel J. (2006) The Globally Integrated Enterprise; Foreign affairs; 85 (3); 127-136 Porter; M. E.; and Kramer; M. R. The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy Harvard Business Review December 2002.

Pruzan; P. (1998). From Control to Values-Based Management and Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics; Vol. 17; pp1379 – 1394.

Roberts; J. (2001) Corporate Governance and the Ethics of Narcissus Business Ethics Quarterly; Volume 11; Issue 1; pp. 109-127.

Citeringar i Crossref