Konferensartikel

Management Systems: Integration Degrees. Empirical Study

Merce Bernardo
Universtitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Marti Casadesus
Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain

Stanislav Karapetrovic
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Iñaki Heras
Universidad del País Vasco, San Sebastián, Spain

Ladda ner artikelhttp://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=033;article=071

Ingår i: 11th QMOD Conference. Quality Management and Organizational Development Attaining Sustainability From Organizational Excellence to SustainAble Excellence; 20-22 August; 2008 in Helsingborg; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 33:71, s. 843-859

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2008-12-09

ISBN:

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this research is to study the degrees of integration of different Management systems (MS) within organizations.

Methodology: A questionnaire was mailed to 362 Spanish organizations asking about the level of integration of resources; documentation and procedures. All companies of the sample have; at least; ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:2004 implemented. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to test the hypothesis: first reduction of data and then a cluster analysis in order to classify the organizations of the sample into few groups representing the levels of integration.

Findings: Companies are classified into three groups; each of them integrating at different levels: harmonization; cooperation and amalgamation. In harmonization (8 organizations) the level of integration is partial and cooperation (41 companies) is the next step; that is; more than partial integration but not full integration yet. Finally; the last group of companies (310 organizations) has full integration of their management systems. A great number of companies integrate their MS but there is a lack in understanding the concept of integration.

Research limitation: The sample is made up by Spanish companies. The regions participating in the study have an intensive level of certification; but the results cannot be applied to the rest of Europe before knowing other countries behavior in practice.

Practical implications: This study contributes in knowing what levels of integration companies can have. It can be useful in the creation of an internationally recognized guideline for integration.

Originality: This study is one of the first empirical researches about integration degrees.

Nyckelord

Integrated Management System (IMS); ISO 9001:2000; ISO 14001:2004; Management System (MS)

Referenser

AENOR (2005); UNE 66177: Sistemas de gestión. Guía para la integración de los sistemas de gestión; AENOR; Madrid; Spain.

Beckmerhagen; I.; Berg; H.; Karapetrovic; S.; Willborn; W. (2003); “Integration of Management Systems: Focus on Safety in the Nuclear Industry“; International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management; Vol. 20; No. 2; pp. 209-227.

Benzécri; J. (1973); L’Analyse Des Données. Tome I. L’Analyse Des Correspondances; Dunod; Paris; France.

Casadesus; M.; Marimon; F.; Heras; I. (2008); “ISO 14001 diffusion after the success of the ISO 9001 model”; Journal of Cleaner Production; (available at doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.11.002)

Fresner; J.; Engelhardt; G. (2004); “Experiences with integrated management systems for two small companies in Austria”; Journal of Cleaner Production; Vol. 12; No. 6; pp. 623-631.

Greenacre; M. (1993); Correspondence Analysis in Practice; Academic Press; London; UK.

Heras; I.; Casadesus; M. (2006); “Los estándares internacionales de sistemas de gestión: pasado; presente y futuro”; Boletín ICE - Revista del Ministerio de Industria; Turismo y Comercio; No. 2876; pp. 45-61.

ISO (2000); ISO 9001:2000. International Standard: Quality management systems – Requirements; International Organization for Standardization; Geneva; Switzerland.

ISO (2004); ISO 14001:2004. International Standard: Environmental management systems – Requirements with guidance for use; International Organization for Standardization; Geneva; Switzerland.

ISO (2005); ISO 9000:2005. International Standard: Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary; International Organization for Standardization; Geneva; Switzerland.

ISO (2007); The ISO survey of certifications; ISO; Geneva; Switzerland (available at www.iso.org).

Johnson; S. (1967); “Hierarchical clustering schemes”; Psychometrika; Vol. 38; pp. 241-254.

Jørgensen; T. (2007); “Towards more sustainable management systems: through life cycle management and integration”; Journal of Cleaner Production; (available at doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.06.006; pp.1-10).

Jørgensen; T.; Remmen; A.; Mellado; M. (2006); “Integrated management systems – three different levels of integration”; Journal of Cleaner Production; Vol. 14; No. 8; pp. 713-722.

Karapetrovic; S. (2002); “Strategies for the integration of management systems and standards”; TQM Magazine; Vol. 14; No. 1; pp. 61-67.

Karapetrovic; S. (2003); “Musing on integrated management systems”; Measuring Business Excellence; Vol. 7; No. 1; pp. 4-13.

Karapetrovic; S.; Casadesus; M.; Heras; I. (2006); Dynamics and Integration of Standardized Management Systems. An empirical Study; Documenta Universitaria; Girona; Spain.

Karapetrovic; S.; Jonker; J. (2003); “Integration of Standardized Management Systems: Searching for a Recipe and Ingredients”; Total Quality Management; Vol. 14; No. 4; pp. 451-459.

Karapetrovic; S.; Willborn; W. (1998); “Integration of Quality and Environmental Management Systems”; TQM Magazine; Vol. 10; No. 3; pp. 204-213.

Pojasek; R. (2006); “Is Your Integrated Management System Really Integrated?”; Environmental Quality Management; Vol. 16; No. 2; pp. 89-97.

Salomone; R. (2008); “Integrated management systems: experiences in Italian organizations”; Journal of Cleaner Production; (available at doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.003)

Sneath; P. (1957); "The applications of computers to taxonomy"; Journal of General Microbiology; Vol. 17; No. 1; pp. 201-226.

Ward; J. (1963); “Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function”; Journal of the American Statistical Association; Vol. 58; No. 301; pp. 236-244.

Wilkinson; G.; Dale; B. (1999); “Integration of Quality; Environment and Health and Safety management systems: an examination of key issues”; Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers; Part B; Journal of Engineering Manufacture; Vol. 213; No. 3; pp. 275-283.

Winder; C. (2000); “Integrating OHS; Environmental; and Quality Management Standards”; Quality Assurance: Good Practice; Regulation; and Law; Vol. 8; No. 2; pp. 105-135.

Wright; T. (2000); “IMS - three into one will go!: the advantages of a single integrated quality; health and safety; and environmental management system”; The Quality Assurance Journal; Vol. 4; No. 3; pp. 137-142.

Zeng; S.; Shi; J.; Lou; G. (2006); “A synergetic model for implementing an integrated management system: an empirical study in China”; Journal of Cleaner Production; Vol. 15; No. 18; pp. 1760-1767.

Zutshi; A.; Sohal; A. (2005); “Integrated management system. The experience of three Australian organizations”; Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management; Vol. 16; No. 2; pp. 211-232.

Citeringar i Crossref