Konferensartikel

Product Complexity Reduction

Maximilian Pasche
Division of Operations Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: 11th QMOD Conference. Quality Management and Organizational Development Attaining Sustainability From Organizational Excellence to SustainAble Excellence; 20-22 August; 2008 in Helsingborg; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 33:80, s. 953-971

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2008-12-09

ISBN:

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays many industrial organisations are dealing with more and more complex products to comply with customer demands. This has the positive effects of increasing the market share and enabling manufacturers to enforce higher product prices. However; increased product complexity comprises some drawbacks as well. Most important to mention are increased product cost but also quality problems and prolonged lead times (Galsworth; 1994). Due to those drawbacks there have been made several attempts to reduce product complexity which were more or less successful (Bohne; 1998; Bliss; 2000). However; nowhere it is mentioned that to enable successful product complexity reduction an according organisational culture has to be developed. That is; to be able to implement an innovative product complexity reduction strategy it is important to create a company culture which fits and supports this strategy. If these two issues are in line with each other the chances for realising this strategy are maximised. Therefore; this paper combines classic approaches of product complexity reduction with the cultural aspects necessary inside the organisation to be successful. The result is a comprehensive guideline for fruitful product complexity reduction efforts.

Purpose: It shall be shown how plans and strategies for product complexity reduction can be derived by analysing the actual product structure. Further; it should be pointed out which kind of organisational culture is necessary to realise these strategies. By doing so; a guideline for product complexity reduction will be created including plans for product complexity reduction efforts as well as how an appropriate and supporting company culture should look like. The result is a comprehensive guideline for successful product complexity reduction efforts.

Research method: In this conceptual paper a method is introduced to analyse the actual product structure according to necessary product complexity which is creating customer benefits and the non-necessary product complexity which is not directly linked to increased customer benefits. Based on this analysis plans and strategies can be derived to reduce non-necessary product complexity. Finally; it will be illustrated that a specific organisational culture is needed to reduce product complexity in a meaningful way.

Results/conclusions: Analysing the product structure according to necessary and non-necessary product complexity enables an organisation to develop strategies and plans to reduce product complexity while at the same time keeping customer benefits constant. To be able to divide product complexity into necessary and non-necessary complexity an understanding has to be developed how product complexity is creating customer benefits and what the impacts of product complexity throughout the organisation are. That is; a broad integrated approach is necessary to gather this information. Therefore a cross functional or system focused organisational culture is necessary.

Nyckelord

Product complexity; organisational culture; system focus; cross-functionality

Referenser

Banker; Rajiv; D.; Datar; Srikant; M.; et al. (1990). Costs of product and process complexity. Measures for Manufacturing Excellence. R. Kaplan; S. Boston; Massachusetts; Harvard Business School Press: 269-290.

Barclay; I. and Dann; Z. (2000). New Product Development Performance Evaluation: a Product Complexity Based Methodology. IEE Proceedings - Science; Measurement and Technology.

Benton; W.; C. and Srivastava; R. (1993). Product Structure Complexity and Inventory Storage Capacity on the Performance of a Multi-Level Manufacturing System. International Journal of Production Research; 31(11): 2531-2545.

Bliss; Christop (2000). Management von Komplexität. Wiesbaden; Gabler Verlag.

Bohne; Fabian (1998). Komplexitätskostenmanagement in der Automobilindustrie - Identifizierung und Gestaltung vielfaltsinduzierter Kosten. Wiesbaden; Gabler Verlag.

Child; Peter; Diederichs; Raimund; et al. (1991). SMR Forum: The Management of Complexity. Sloan Management Review; 33(1): 73-80.

Deal; T.; E. and Kennedy; A. (1982). Corporate Cultures - The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life; Penguin.

Ding; Fong-Yuen; Sun; Hui; et al. (2007). Analysing Product Complexity Related to Product Variety in a Manufacturing Firm with a Case Study at an Automobile Assembly Plant. International Journal of Logistics Management; 3(3): 356-376.

Gray; Harry; J. (1985). Research and Manufacturing Should Be Partners. Research Management; Nov-Dec: 6-8.

Guide; V. D. R.; Srivastava; R.; et al. (1997). Product Structure Complexity and Scheduling of Operations in Recoverable Manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research; 35(11): 3179-3199.

Hobday; Mike (1998). Product Complexity; Innovation and Industrial Organisation. Research Policy; 26(6): 689.

Iansiti; Marco (1995). Technology Integration: Managing Technological Evolution in a Complex Environment. Research Policy; 24(4): 521-542.

Kahn; Kenneth; B. (1996). Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management; 13(2): 137-151.

Kotteaku; A. G.; Laios; L. G.; et al. (1995). The Influence of Product Complexity on the Purchasing Structure. International Journal of Management Science; 23(1): 27-39.

Lawrence; Paul; R. and Lorsch; Jay; W. (1967). New Management Job: The Integrator. Harvard Business Review; Nov-Dec: 142-151.

MacDuffie; John Paul; Sethuraman; Kannan; et al. (1996). Product Variety and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from the International Automotive Assembly Plant Study. Management Science; 42(3): 350-369.

Martensen; Anne and Dahlgaard; Jens.J. (1999). Strategy and Planning for Innovation Management - a Business Excellence Approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Managemet; 16(8): 734-755.

Novak; Sharon and Eppinger; Steven D. (2001). Sourcing by Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain. Management Science; 47(1): 189-204.

Patzak; G. (1982). Das System. Systemtechnik - Planung komplexer innovativer Systeme. Berlin/Heidelberg; Springer Verlag.

Schein; Edgar; H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership - A Dynamic View. London; Jossey-Bass.

Suh; Nam P. (2005). Introduction. Complexity - Theory and Applications. New York; Oxford University Press.

Sum; Chee-Choung; Oon-Sen Png; Daniel; et al. (1993). Effects of Product Structure Complexity on Multi-level Lot Sizing. Decision Sciences; 24(6): 1135-1156.

Walton; Richard; E. and Dutton; John; M. (1969). The Management of Interdepartmental Conflict: A Model and Review. Administrative Science Quarterly; 14: 73-84.

Wolff; Michael; F. (1985). Bridging the R&D Interface with Manufacturing. Research Management; 28(1): 9-11.

Citeringar i Crossref