Juan Azcárate
Royal Insitute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Berit Balfors
Royal Insitute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Ladda ner artikelIngår i: Current Issues in European Cultural Studies; June 15-17; Norrköping; Sweden 2011
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 62:26, s. 243-249
Publicerad: 2011-11-22
ISBN: 978-91-7519-993-1
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
In an effort to counterbalance the inequalities and unequal power relationships that have resulted of globalisation; and to include varying perspectives of development in decision-making; non governmental organisations (NGOs) are increasingly acting as forums for marginalised and vulnerable communities. Through networks; NGOs have also enhanced the exchange of ideas; skills and knowledge between a wider sector of society. However; NGOs have been criticised by failing to effectively use their resources and capacities to significantly influence debates and decision making. To reach effectiveness; NGOs need to develop certain capacities and better understand their relationships.
For this; planning and decision making support processes like strategic environmental assessment can be useful. In this paper the experiences that were gained by the museum members and communities of Samp Intercontinental Museum Network; a Swedish registered NGO; are presented. The results were participant engagement; process ownership; capacity mobilisation; and the identification of key issues to better understand the work of the network. It is argued that participative; adaptable and flexible strategic environmental assessment processes can support cultural network organisations to make their higher level guiding concepts operable; to share and develop capacities across borders and to reach long term transformations in society.
Bontenbal; M. (2009). Understanding North–South municipal partnership conditions for capacity development: A Dutch–Peruvian example. Habitat International Vol. 33; Issue 1; pp. 100–105.
ECDPM (2008). Policy Management Brief No. 21. Capacity Change and Performance; Insights and Implications for Development Cooperation. European Centre for Development Policy Management.
Gardner; K. and Lewis; D. (1996) Anthropology; Development and the Post-Modern Challenge. Pluto Press.
Hedo; D. and Bina; O. (1999). Strategic environmental assessment of hydrological and irrigation plans in Castilla y León; Spain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review; 19; 15 259–273.
Hildén; M. (1999). Myths and reality in EIA and SEA. In: H Bjamadottir (ed) Environmental Assessment in the Nordic Countries; Karlskrona; Sweden.
Jiliberto H.; R. (2007). Strategic environmental assessment: the need to transform the environmental assessment paradigms. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management; Vol. 9; No. 2; 211–234.
Jordan; L. and Van Tuijl; P. (2000). Political Responsibility in Transnational NGO Advocacy. World Development. Vol. 28; No. 12; pp. 2051–2065.
Nelson; P. (2002). New Agendas and New Patterns of International NGO Political Action. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations; Vol. 13; No. 4. pp. 377–392.
Nitz; T. and Brown; A.L. (2001). SEA must learn how policy making works. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management; Vol. 3; No. 3; 329–342.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006). The Challenge of Capacity Development. Working towards good practice. Paris:OECD
Rossouw; N. Audouin; M.; Lochner; P.; Clark; S.H.; and Wiseman; K. (2000). Developmentof strategic environmental assessment in South Africa. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal; 18; 217–223.
Samp (2009a). To Be a Member; Ser Miembro; Etre Member. Samp intercontinental museum network.
Samp (2009b). Strategic Plan 2010–2014. Samp intercontinental museum network. http://www.samp.org/index.php?option=com_jdownloads&Itemid=141&task=viewcategor y&catid=6&site=2&start=5.
Sheate; WR; S Dagg; J Richardson; R Aschemann; J Palerm and U Steen (2001).SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making (3 Volumes). Final Report to the European Commission; DG XI; Contract No. B4- 3040/99/136634/MAR/B4.Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/eia/ seasupport.htm#int; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; Luxembourg; 438 pp.
Schuh; RG and L Leviton (2006). A framework to assess the development and capacity of non-profit agencies. Evaluation and Program Planning; 29; 171–179.
Therivel; R and M Partidário (1996). The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2002). Capacity for Development. New solutions to old problems. Executive summary. London:Earthscan.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2006). UNDP Capacity Development. Practice Note. New York:UNDP.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2009). Capacity Development: A UNDP Primer. United Nations Development Programme. New York: UNDP
Vicente; G. and Partidario; M.R. (2006). SEA – Enhancing communication for better environmental decisions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review; 26; 696–706.