Designing models for online use with Modelica and FMI

Pål Kittilsen
Cybernetica AS, 7038 Trondheim/Statoil Research Centre, Trondheim, Norway

Svein Olav Hauger
Cybernetica AS, 7038 Trondheim, Norway

Stein O. Wasbø
Cybernetica AS, 7038 Trondheim, Norway

Ladda ner artikelhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp12076197

Ingår i: Proceedings of the 9th International MODELICA Conference; September 3-5; 2012; Munich; Germany

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 76:19, s. 197-204

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2012-11-19

ISBN: 978-91-7519-826-2

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)


Model-based online applications such as soft-sensing; fault detection or model predictive control require representative models. Basing models on physics has the advantage of naturally describing nonlinear processes and potentially describing a wide range of operating conditions. Implementing adaptivity is essential for online use to avoid model performance degradation over time and to compensate for model imperfection. Requirements for identifiability and observability; numerical robustness and computational speed place an upper limit on model complexity. These considerations motivate that models for online use should be balanced-complexity; physically based with online adaption possible.

Despite potential benefits; the effort required to implement balanced-complexity models; particularly at large scales; may deter their use. This paper presents techniques used in the design of balanced-complexity models. A Modelica-based approach is chosen to reduce implementation effort by interfacing exported Modelica models with application code by means of the generic interface FMI. The suggested approach is demonstrated by parameter estimation for a process of offshore oil production: a subsea well-manifold-pipeline production system.


Modeling; process control; process models; process simulators; offshore oil and gas production; Modelica; subsea production; multiphase flow; balanced-complexity models; nonlinear model-predictive control; FMI


[1] B. Bringedal; E. Storkaas; M. Dalsmo; M. Aaarset; and H. M. With. Recent developments in control and monitoring of remote subsea fields. In SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition; Utrecht; The Netherlands; 2010.

[2] F. Casella; F. Donida; and J. Akesson. Objectoriented modeling and optimal control: A case study in powerplant start-up. In Proc. 18th IFAC World Congress; Milano; Italy; volume 18; 2011.

[3] S. Elgsæter; O. Slupphaug; and T. A. Johansen. Challenges in parameter estimation of models for offshore oil and gas production optimization. In International Petroleum Technology Conference; Dubai; 2007. doi: 10.2523/11728-MS.

[4] H. Elmqvist; H. Tummescheit; and M. Otter. Object-oriented modeling of thermo-fluid systems. Proceedings of 3rd Int. Modelica Conference; pages 269–286; 2003.

[5] B. A. Foss and T. S. Schei. Putting nonlinear model predictive control into use. In Assessment and Future Directions Nonlinear Model Predictive Control; LNCIS 358; pages 407–417. Springer Verlag; 2007.

[6] R. Franke; B. S. Babji; M. Antoine; and A. Isaksson. Model-based online applications in the abb dynamic optimization framework. In Modelica’ 2008; Bielefeld; Germany; 2008.

[7] J. M. Godhavn; A. Pavlov; G. O. Kaasa; and N. L. Rolland. Drilling seeking automatic control solutions. In Proc. 18th IFAC World Congress; Milano; Italy; volume 18; Milano;Italy; 2011.

[8] L. Imsland; P. Kittilsen; and T. S. Schei. Modelbased optimizing control and estimation using modelica models. In Modelica’2008; Bielefeld; Germany; 2008.

[9] E. Jahanashahi and S. Skogestad. Simplified dynamical models for control of severe slugging in multiphase risers. In Proc. 18th IFAC World Congress; Milano; Italy; volume 18; Milano; Italy; 2011.

[10] K. Krueger; M. Rode; R. Franke; and B. A. Foss. Optimization of boiler start-up using a nonlinear boiler model and hard constraints. Energy; 29(12-15):2239–2251; 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.022.

[11] S. McArdle; D. Cameron; and K. Meyer. The life cycle simulator: From concept to commissioning... and beyond. In SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition; pages 246–267; Utrecht; The Netherlands; 2010.

[12] P. Meum; P. Tøndel; J. M. Godhavn; and O. M. Aaamo. Optimization of smart well production through nonlinear model predictive control. In Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition; Amsterdam; The Netherlands; 2008.

[13] A. Mjaavatten; Robert Aasheim; Steinar Saelid; and Oddvar Gronning. Model for gas coning and rate-dependent gas/oil ratio in an oil-rim reservoir. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering; 11(5); 2008. doi: 10.2118/102390-PA.

[14] Z. K. Nagy; B. Mahn; R. Franke; and F. Allg¨ower. Nonlinear model predicitive control of batch processes: an industrial case study. In Proc. 16th IFAC World Congress; Prague; Czech Republic; volume 16; 2005.

[15] R. van der Linden and A. Leemhuis. The use of model predictive control for asset production optimization: Application to a thin-rim oil field case. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition; Florence; Italy; 2010.

[16] A. Willersrud; L. Imsland; S. O. Hauger; and P. Kittlsen. Short-term production optimization of offshore oil and gas production using nonlinear model predictive control. In Proc. 18th IFAC World Congress; Milano; Italy; volume 18; Milano; Italy; 2011.

Citeringar i Crossref